> On 09/21/2010 12:05 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
>> I'm done on my changes for 1.2.31
>> Log rotation should be done (pending testing by someone other than me
>> ;),
>> and a quick scan of the IIS bugs didn't reveal any obvious candidates
>> for
>> further fixes.
>>
>
> Coll. I'll do some testings
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas 2010-09-21 15:36:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Mark, I've just glanced-over RFC 2616 and I can't find any HTTP methods
> (defined in section 9) that specifically prohibit a request body.
TRACE does.
Author: kkolinko
Date: Tue Sep 21 18:51:42 2010
New Revision: 999540
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=999540&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=9995
Author: kkolinko
Date: Tue Sep 21 18:36:15 2010
New Revision: 999527
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=999527&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=9995
Author: kkolinko
Date: Tue Sep 21 18:21:38 2010
New Revision: 999523
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=999523&view=rev
Log:
correct a typo
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/systemprops.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/systemprops.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/vie
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49929
--- Comment #6 from brett.dellegra...@intact-is.com 2010-09-21 13:19:54 EDT ---
Hi,
When using the test servlet the problem appears on the next request when its on
the same socket so its a good idea to have a static file around to request
i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49929
--- Comment #5 from Mladen Turk 2010-09-21 13:00:11 EDT ---
I have tried your test servlet, but I cannot see anything suspicious.
There is no additional packets following the lorem ipsum.
Tested on Tomcat 6.0.29, 6.0.x trunk and Tomcat 7.
B
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Sep 21 16:16:10 2010
New Revision: 999482
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=999482&view=rev
Log:
Update changelog
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/vi
Sorry but skip the question!
Thanks;
--Gurkan
- Original Message
From: Gurkan Erdogdu
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 6:30:43 PM
Subject: NamingContext Possible Bug
Hello folks,
In NamingContext implementation, if "lookup()" is a Reference, current
implemen
Hello folks,
In NamingContext implementation, if "lookup()" is a Reference, current
implementation caches the result of the NamingManager # getObjectInstance via
following statements and changes the type of the entry. In the following
lookups, same object is returned. I would like to write Obje
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz
2010-09-21 10:56:59 EDT ---
Mark, I've just glanced-over RFC 2616 and I can't find any HTTP methods
(defined in section 9) that specifically prohibit a request body.
On the other hand, section 4.3 s
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Bug 49914 - "Filter on url-pattern of "/" is not invoked"
> And "" is supposed to be root not "/" according to the specs.
Don't think so. The empty string is used only to specify the path of the
default context, not patter
I just committed a proposed fix for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49511 - if can simulate
the required conditions that could bear some testing as well.
cheers
tim
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 09/21/2010 12:05 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
>
>> I'm
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49511
--- Comment #6 from Tim Whittington 2010-09-21 07:09:19 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=26060)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26060)
Patch to prevent override of logging for unmapped requests
--
Configure bu
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49511
--- Comment #5 from Tim Whittington 2010-09-21 07:08:25 EDT
---
I've committed a fix to prevent logging unless we actually mapped the current
request into the ISAPI Redirector into trunk.
Can you please build and test this version (or alt
Author: timw
Date: Tue Sep 21 11:05:44 2010
New Revision: 999308
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=999308&view=rev
Log:
Fix #49511 - track when we map a request into the ISAPI Redirector during
filter notification, and only correct the IIS log information for individual
requests within a mul
On 09/21/2010 12:05 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
I'm done on my changes for 1.2.31
Log rotation should be done (pending testing by someone other than me ;),
and a quick scan of the IIS bugs didn't reveal any obvious candidates for
further fixes.
Coll. I'll do some testings on IIS6 and IIS7
I wo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49511
--- Comment #4 from Tim Whittington 2010-09-21 06:37:04 EDT
---
> I think the reason for
this is that the redirect filter was only set to serve the jsp files (dynamic
content) but the js and gif (the static content) were served by the IIS
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 10:15 +0200, Wesley Acheson wrote:
> So to get this straight Rémy you think it should be a WONT FIX too?
For the actual resolution, you have to talk with Mark.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.
I'm done on my changes for 1.2.31
Log rotation should be done (pending testing by someone other than me ;),
and a quick scan of the IIS bugs didn't reveal any obvious candidates for
further fixes.
cheers
tim
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 14.09.2010 01:14, William A. R
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 16:31 -0700, Mark Thomas wrote:
> If he wants universal filtering, he can use "/*" I think, right ?
Yes that should work. I use that all the time. And "" is supposed to
be root not "/" according to the specs.
> As we
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 16:31 -0700, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I agree the spec isn't crystal clear.
>
> I took the use of the word "partial" to refer to requests and URIs in
> the welcome file to mean that the "complete" request was the result of
> adding the welcome file. With that in mind, it seems na
23 matches
Mail list logo
