Author: kkolinko
Date: Wed Jul 14 06:24:18 2010
New Revision: 963956
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=963956&view=rev
Log:
vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=9639
Thanks a lot Mark!
--Gurkan
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Developers List
Sent: Tue, July 13, 2010 11:14:42 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 7 Maven Artifacts
On 13/07/2010 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/07/2010 13:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 13/07/2010 13:12, Gurka
2010/7/14 Alexander Shirkov :
>
> I really need advice and guidance: where to start my path.
>
Hi, Alexander!
You are welcome. Here are some links:
http://tomcat.apache.org/getinvolved.html
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/building.html
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/BUILDING.tx
Hello all,
Finally I¹ve decided to spend part of my freetime to community project. This
thought was flying in my head for long time and finally VMWare¹s
presentation on Tomcat 7 triggered it. I really believe, that this intention
will be strong enough to be alive for many years.
Since I¹m ³nobody
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-13 18:08:34 EDT ---
Sorry truck should have been trunk and trunk == 7.0.x so it is already there.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
--- Comment #10 from Yair Lenga 2010-07-13 17:54:53 EDT
---
Mark,
Thanks for taking the change. I'll follow you suggestions regarding svn diff
for the next time.
Do I have to submit anything for the change to flow to 7.X ?
Yair
--
Con
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jul 13 21:38:28 2010
New Revision: 963870
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=963870&view=rev
Log:
Proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=963
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-13 17:38:55 EDT ---
In the end I used the patch a guide and write a new one. Some additional
comments:
- if you do an svn diff against a normal source tree patches usually apply
cleanly
- new features
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jul 13 21:35:39 2010
New Revision: 963868
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=963868&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
Disable exec by default in SSI and provide an option to enable it for both
Servlet and Filter
Modified:
t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-13 17:16:40 EDT ---
The diff is inverted and the patch is using tabs rather than spaces. I should
eb able to work with that but you might need to fix it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.
On 13/07/2010 15:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/07/2010 13:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 13/07/2010 13:12, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>>> Hello Mark;
>>>
>>> Where is the location? Not able to find
>>
>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tomcat/
>>
>> It looks like the script we have for generatin
On 13/07/2010 19:57, Rainer Jung wrote:
> I had a look at BZ46451. It suggests adding subversion properties to
> enable the use of subversion bugtraq. This allows a better integration
> of BZ into subversion commit messages and retrieval when looking at svn
> logs.
> Comments?
I was playing with
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
--- Comment #7 from Yair Lenga 2010-07-13 15:52:28 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25760)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25760)
Patch to disable exec by default, new allowExec tag
Patch for three files, create
I had a look at BZ46451. It suggests adding subversion properties to
enable the use of subversion bugtraq. This allows a better integration
of BZ into subversion commit messages and retrieval when looking at svn
logs.
There is a blog here
http://markphip.blogspot.com/2007/01/integrating-subve
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49591
Summary: Custom error page always uses Transfer-Encoding:
chunked
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
S
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46350
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Jung 2010-07-13 14:08:11
EDT ---
Source artifacts are now provided for Tomcat 7.
We'll see whether and when this gets backported to TC 6.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49402
Rainer Jung changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jul 13 16:02:09 2010
New Revision: 963776
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=963776&view=rev
Log:
Sign the pom.
Make sure source jar signature doesn't overwrite the non-source jar signature.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/res/ma
On 13/07/2010 13:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/07/2010 13:12, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>> Hello Mark;
>>
>> Where is the location? Not able to find
>
> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tomcat/
>
> It looks like the script we have for generating stuff isn't quite right.
> Henk runs a script
On 13/07/2010 13:12, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hello Mark;
>
> Where is the location? Not able to find
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tomcat/
It looks like the script we have for generating stuff isn't quite right.
Henk runs a script that regularly scans the repo for errors and it
picked
On 13/07/2010 13:41, Petr Sumbera wrote:
>
>
>
> markt-2 wrote:
>>
>> On 13/07/2010 12:08, Petr Sumbera wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> why not to allow Tomcat 6 to be built with JDK 1.6. With commons-dbcp-1.4
>>> it
>>> seems so easy (see bellow). Any comment on this? Or at least allow to
>>> choose
markt-2 wrote:
>
> On 13/07/2010 12:08, Petr Sumbera wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> why not to allow Tomcat 6 to be built with JDK 1.6. With commons-dbcp-1.4
>> it
>> seems so easy (see bellow). Any comment on this? Or at least allow to
>> choose?
>
> Because the Servlet specification requires Java
On 13/07/2010 12:08, Petr Sumbera wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> why not to allow Tomcat 6 to be built with JDK 1.6. With commons-dbcp-1.4 it
> seems so easy (see bellow). Any comment on this? Or at least allow to
> choose?
Because the Servlet specification requires Java 1.5 support and there
are issues wit
Hello Mark;
Where is the location? Not able to find
Thanks;
--Gurkan
From: Mark Thomas
To: Tomcat Developers List
Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 7:03:11 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 7 Maven Artifacts
On 04/07/2010 10:57, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 11:43, Gurka
Hi,
why not to allow Tomcat 6 to be built with JDK 1.6. With commons-dbcp-1.4 it
seems so easy (see bellow). Any comment on this? Or at least allow to
choose?
Thanks,
Petr
--- apache-tomcat-6.0.28-src/build.properties.default.orig
+++ apache-tomcat-6.0.28-src/build.properties.default
-# -
25 matches
Mail list logo
