Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Mar 15 05:57:22 2010
New Revision: 923065
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=923065&view=rev
Log:
revoke my proposal and add veto to markt's
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/to
Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Mar 15 05:52:48 2010
New Revision: 923063
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=923063&view=rev
Log:
Revoke one proposal, and propose another to fix BZ 48903
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
--- Comment #12 from pmones...@gmail.com 2010-03-14 20:58:10 UTC ---
yea I guess you are right. The stacktrace is suspicious in the sense that there
is no line number here:
at
org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.findClass(WebappClas
On 03/14/2010 07:31 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
I am -1.
IMHO JIRA can do a better job then status file.
The questions you've raised actually show how
hard it is to get something out of status.
It's a mixture of hundreds of commit messages,
references to other commit messages, p.a.o
files th
I am -1.
1. Voting system in a bug tracker has its purpose:
prioritizing of issues.
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/v3.13.2/voterswatchers.html
What you are proposing abuses that system.
2. There are all kinds of votes: +1,-1,+0,-0, with and without
arbitrary comments.
3. Patches c
On 03/14/2010 12:06 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.03.2010 08:07, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I would suggest that we use JIRA instead maintaining STATUS.txt files.
Each branch can then be a separate component and each status vote
JIRA issue classified as either bug, feature, etc...
Voting is supporte
On 14.03.2010 08:07, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I would suggest that we use JIRA instead maintaining STATUS.txt files.
Each branch can then be a separate component and each status vote
JIRA issue classified as either bug, feature, etc...
Voting is supported except that one cannot vote for the create
On 14/03/2010 07:07, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I would suggest that we use JIRA instead maintaining STATUS.txt files.
Each branch can then be a separate component and each status vote
JIRA issue classified as either bug, feature, etc...
Voting is supported except that one cannot vote for the create
+1
Peter
Am 14.03.2010 um 08:07 schrieb Mladen Turk:
Hi,
I would suggest that we use JIRA instead maintaining STATUS.txt files.
Each branch can then be a separate component and each status vote
JIRA issue classified as either bug, feature, etc...
Voting is supported except that one cannot vot
15 matches
Mail list logo
