svn commit: r901512 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationServletRegistration.java test/org/apache/catalina/deploy/TestSecurityConstraint.java

2010-01-20 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Thu Jan 21 03:15:28 2010 New Revision: 901512 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=901512&view=rev Log: Followup to r901507 svn:eol-style and svn:keywords for the new files Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationServletRegistration.java (pr

svn commit: r901507 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/ java/org/apache/catalina/core/ java/org/apache/catalina/deploy/ test/org/apache/catalina/deploy/

2010-01-20 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Jan 21 02:57:10 2010 New Revision: 901507 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=901507&view=rev Log: Servlet 3.0 implementation Implement some more of the new ServletContext methods Added: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationServletRegistration.java

svn commit: r901504 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Request.java

2010-01-20 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Jan 21 02:44:03 2010 New Revision: 901504 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=901504&view=rev Log: Sync with recent rename Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Request.java Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Request.java U

svn commit: r901503 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core: ApplicationPart.java StandardPart.java

2010-01-20 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Jan 21 02:38:20 2010 New Revision: 901503 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=901503&view=rev Log: Rename Added: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationPart.java - copied, changed from r900474, tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/Standard

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.24

2010-01-20 Thread Yoav Shapira
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:25 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ X ] Stable I did not run the TCK, but I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48584] Error or ACCESS_VIOLATION on shutdown

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48584 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor -- Configure bugmail:

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.24

2010-01-20 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/1/20 Konstantin Kolinko : > 2010/1/19 jean-frederic clere : >> The candidates binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/ >> >> > > Tested > apache-tomcat-6.0.24.exe > apache-tomcat-6.0.24-windows-x86.zip > > Environment: JRE 6u17 on WinXP 32-bit > Teste

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48584] Error or ACCESS_VIOLATION on shutdown

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48584 --- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-01-20 14:14:10 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24870) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24870) hs_err_pid5364.log -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugz

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48584] New: Error or ACCESS_VIOLATION on shutdown

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48584 Summary: Error or ACCESS_VIOLATION on shutdown Product: Tomcat Native Version: 1.1.19 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priorit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48543] More flexibility in specifying -Dcatalina.config

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543 --- Comment #5 from Rob S. 2010-01-20 13:53:59 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24869) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24869) Patch to add new catalina.config.filename property. -- Configure bugmail: https://is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48543] More flexibility in specifying -Dcatalina.config

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48543 --- Comment #4 from Rob S. 2010-01-20 13:53:28 UTC --- Hi guys, First of all, amazing work on the build environment. Instructions were easy to follow and everything (including the unit tests) worked on the first go. Contributing could no

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48580] 6.0.24: AccessControlException in ProtectedFunctionMapper on first access to certain JSP

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 --- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-01-20 13:43:29 UTC --- Reproduced in 6.0.24 with 6u18 and 6u16 JREs. Reproduced in 6.0.20 with 6u18 and 6u17 JREs and catalina.policy file from 6.0.24. So, technically, it is not a regression. -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48582] JspServletWrapper.getServletContext() throws NullPointerException

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582 --- Comment #1 from Tim McCune 2010-01-20 13:28:36 UTC --- I should also have noted that after this NullPointerException occurs, we then continue to get this error over and over: ERROR [org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[jboss.web].[

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48582] New: JspServletWrapper.getServletContext() throws NullPointerException

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582 Summary: JspServletWrapper.getServletContext() throws NullPointerException Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.20 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48581] 5.5.28: AccessControlException in InternalOutputBuffer.sendStatus

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48581 --- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-01-20 12:30:05 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24867) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24867) localhost.2010-01-20.log -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48581] New: 5.5.28: AccessControlException in InternalOutputBuffer.sendStatus

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48581 Summary: 5.5.28: AccessControlException in InternalOutputBuffer.sendStatus Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.28 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48580] 6.0.24: AccessControlException in ProtectedFunctionMapper on first access to certain JSP

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 --- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-01-20 12:09:18 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24866) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24866) localhost.2010-01-20.log The stack trace with an AccessControlException

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48580] 6.0.24: AccessControlException in ProtectedFunctionMapper on first access to certain JSP

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 --- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko 2010-01-20 12:02:34 UTC --- *** Bug 48438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48438] RC2 of 6.0.21: java.security.AccessControlException on Error 500 page

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48438 Konstantin Kolinko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48580] New: 6.0.24: AccessControlException in ProtectedFunctionMapper on first access to certain JSP

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48580 Summary: 6.0.24: AccessControlException in ProtectedFunctionMapper on first access to certain JSP Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.20 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.24

2010-01-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:25 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is: > [X] Stable > Tested OK w/ no regressions from 6.0.20.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.24

2010-01-20 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/1/19 jean-frederic clere : > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] Stable > Tested apache-tomcat-6.0.24.exe apache-tomcat-6.0.24-windo

Re: Tomcat encryption algorithms in binary

2010-01-20 Thread Mark Thomas
On 20/01/2010 13:44, Shan, Justine wrote: > Existing documentation yielded nothing. Perhaps I should've been more > specific on the "need". I need to assess the algorithm info in order to > ensure export compliance for one of our products that uses Tomcat. I thought > Dev would be more suitable

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.24

2010-01-20 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
On 01/19/2010 07:25 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: [X] Stable - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

RE: Tomcat encryption algorithms in binary

2010-01-20 Thread Shan, Justine
Existing documentation yielded nothing. Perhaps I should've been more specific on the "need". I need to assess the algorithm info in order to ensure export compliance for one of our products that uses Tomcat. I thought Dev would be more suitable for this question other than the Legal... -O

Re: Tomcat encryption algorithms in binary

2010-01-20 Thread Ian Darwin
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 07:31:47PM +0100, Shan, Justine wrote: > Hi, > > As far as I know, the only encryption implemented by Tomcat itself > is SSL. But I need to know what exactly algorithms have been > implemented and distributed with the binary from Apache Tomcat 5.X > and 6. Sorry, but your

Tomcat encryption algorithms in binary

2010-01-20 Thread Shan, Justine
Hi, As far as I know, the only encryption implemented by Tomcat itself is SSL. But I need to know what exactly algorithms have been implemented and distributed with the binary from Apache Tomcat 5.X and 6. To my understanding, Tomcat relies on the JVM or JCE installed on the user's machine to

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.24

2010-01-20 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/19/2010 03:25 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/ According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Cheers -- ^TM -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48577] New: vulnerability in DefaultServlet

2010-01-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48577 Summary: vulnerability in DefaultServlet Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.20 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Com

svn commit: r901101 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/download-native.html xdocs/download-native.xml

2010-01-20 Thread jfclere
Author: jfclere Date: Wed Jan 20 08:29:35 2010 New Revision: 901101 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=901101&view=rev Log: Arrange the link. Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-native.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/download-native.xml Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-nat

Re: native-doc part of Tomcat site: outdated?

2010-01-20 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/19/2010 01:59 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > Is http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/ generated from /native/trunk, > or from /native/branches/1.1.x/ ? > > Apparently the site for 1.1.18 was generated from trunk, but the one > for 1.1.19 from the 1.1.x branch. > > There are two errors: >