Re: DBCP 1.3/1.4

Hi, > familiar in what sense? how would jdbc-pool be unfamiliar in terms of > config? > I would say the opposite, most users wouldn't even know the difference, > especially since we don't ship org.apache.commons.dbcp, but we refactor it > to org.apache.tomcat.dbcp This refactor has caused queries

Tomcat 7 - META-INF/context.xml

I would like to suggest that context.xml files that are contained within directories or WAR files do not get copied to a sub directory under "conf" where it remains if the war file or directory is removed while the server is shutdown. Copying the file META-INF/context.xml has never made much s

Re: tomcat-jdbc pool interceptor

hi Kevin, hi Kevin, what you seem to be missing in your config is testOnBorrow="true" Filip On 12/02/2009 05:11 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote: Hi, We have a situation with a clustered SQL Server database and tomcat-jdbc. When the cluster fails over and the active node switches to the passive node,

Re: DBCP 1.3/1.4

On 12/08/2009 11:04 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: Tim Funk wrote: [I know I'm missing something .. but] Would it be worth dropping dbcp from 7 and just use jdbc-pool? I think dropping dbcp would be bad - it is something that is familiar to lots of users. familiar in what sense? how would

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "FAQ/Performance_and_Monitori ng" by BjornFreemanBenson

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The "FAQ/Performance_and_Monitoring" page has been changed by BjornFreemanBenson. http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Performance_and_Monitoring?action=diff&rev1=4&rev2=5 ---

Re: DBCP 1.3/1.4

Tim Funk wrote: > [I know I'm missing something .. but] Would it be worth dropping dbcp > from 7 and just use jdbc-pool? I think dropping dbcp would be bad - it is something that is familiar to lots of users. +1 to including jdbc-pool Which one to make the default? My very rough (not really tho

svn commit: r888499 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationDispatcher.java

Author: markt Date: Tue Dec 8 17:59:57 2009 New Revision: 888499 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=888499&view=rev Log: Correct TODO - thanks sebb Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationDispatcher.java Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/Applica

Re: DBCP 1.3/1.4

[I know I'm missing something .. but] Would it be worth dropping dbcp from 7 and just use jdbc-pool? -Tim Mark Thomas wrote: Commons is close to the next DBCP release. I have been looking at this and there will, unfortunately, still be some Java 5 with JDBC 3 / Java 6 with JDBC 4 issues. It

DBCP 1.3/1.4

Commons is close to the next DBCP release. I have been looking at this and there will, unfortunately, still be some Java 5 with JDBC 3 / Java 6 with JDBC 4 issues. It isn't possible to work around them without a complete refactoring and/or multiple JARs and/or use of something like BCEL. Rather t

Re: svn commit: r887992 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina: core/ApplicationDispatcher.java core/ApplicationFilterChain.java core/StandardWrapperValve.java deploy/FilterDef.java startup/Con

sebb wrote: > On 07/12/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote: >> -// FIXME: Exception handling needs to be simpiler to what is >> in the StandardWrapperValue >> +// FIXME: Exception handling needs to be simpler to what is in >> the StandardWrapperValue > > Should that be "simi