Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2009/08/02]

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2009/08/02]

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2009/08/02]

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 6 [2009/08/02]

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 7 [2009/08/02]

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47378] welcome-file ignores servlet mapping

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47378 --- Comment #13 from Rex Wang 2009-08-02 22:40:08 PST --- Hi, Tim if I set Hello ## not "/Hello" here it seems work correctly. I tried tracking the code, and if use "Hello", the mappingData.wrapper != null But, if use

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47378] welcome-file ignores servlet mapping

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47378 --- Comment #12 from Rex Wang 2009-08-02 19:43:07 PST --- and I did not create a "placeholder". -Rex -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47378] welcome-file ignores servlet mapping

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47378 --- Comment #11 from Rex Wang 2009-08-02 19:41:08 PST --- Hi Tim, I tried again.. but still not work. I am not sure if we are on the same page, this is my web.xml: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; ...> /Hello

Re: 5.5.28 issue when multiple services with engines named the same

2009-08-02 Thread Steven Mahurin
Filip, Yeah, I just went back and re-read the Engine config documentation. It seems as though I misunderstood it when I read it last time. "When using muliple Service elements in the same Server, each Engine MUST be assigned a unique name." I was thinking it was saying each Engi

Re: 5.5.28 issue when multiple services with engines named the same

2009-08-02 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Hi Steven, I think the engine name unique per server has been there for a very long time. for example the directory conf/Catalina/localhost/ is conf/Engine name/Host name and not Service name, so this would make the engine unique filip On 08/02/2009 12:16 PM, Steven Mahurin wrote: I am using

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove Realm from GenericPrincipal

2009-08-02 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2009/7/17 Mark Thomas : > As a result of looking into > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40881, I discovered > that the only use made of the Realm attribute of GenericPrincipal is to > control whether or not a debug message is logged in RealmBase.hasRole() > > Given that the Realm

5.5.28 issue when multiple services with engines named the same

2009-08-02 Thread Steven Mahurin
I am using tomcat 5.5.27 to run a set of simple set of applications. I am looking at 5.5.28 to address a number of security vulnerabilties. When I tried the 5.5.28, we ran into an issue when two services were defined in server.xml, if the same engine name was used for both but different host

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.28

2009-08-02 Thread sebb
On 02/08/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > sebb wrote: > > Just noticed another problem - the source archive does not contain the > > overall build script. > > > I don't know where you are looking, but the script is there. Sorry, my bad - I'd expanded the archives and was looking in the wrong director

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.28

2009-08-02 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.28/ > > According to the release process, the 5.5.28 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] Stable A few minor niggles but nothing to stop the release.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.28

2009-08-02 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > Just noticed another problem - the source archive does not contain the > overall build script. I don't know where you are looking, but the script is there. > There are probably other source files missing. Making assumptions about what is and isn't present is not helpful. There are

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47609] Failsafe EOL conversion

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47609 Sebb changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24080|0 |1 is obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47609] Failsafe EOL conversion

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47609 --- Comment #4 from Sebb 2009-08-02 08:24:37 PST --- Created an attachment (id=24080) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24080) fixcrlf use include rather than exclude -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.28

2009-08-02 Thread sebb
On 27/07/2009, sebb wrote: > On 27/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > > The candidates binaries are available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.28/ > > > > According to the release process, the 5.5.28 tag is: > > > [X] Broken > > Because: > * There a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47609] Failsafe EOL conversion

2009-08-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47609 --- Comment #3 from Sebb 2009-08-02 07:26:27 PST --- OK, I will create a patch shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the

svn commit: r800083 - /tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/sign.bat

2009-08-02 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Sun Aug 2 14:13:04 2009 New Revision: 800083 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=800083&view=rev Log: Prep for next release Modified: tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/sign.bat Modified: tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/sign.bat URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/sign.bat?