Hi,
We are using Apache Tomcat 5.5. I need to implement an
interceptor so as to monitor java memory heap usage and threads. Please
give some suggestions on how to do so.
Regards,
Rishabh Agrawal
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Dec 23 20:56:48 2008
New Revision: 729229
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729229&view=rev
Log:
organize NIO patches, and cast my vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/t
Author: billbarker
Date: Tue Dec 23 19:30:40 2008
New Revision: 729206
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729206&view=rev
Log:
insure that classes are loaded by trusted code in a sandbox
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11Processor.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Dec 23 18:57:14 2008
New Revision: 729202
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729202&view=rev
Log:
commit approved fix
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapp
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Dec 23 18:54:09 2008
New Revision: 729200
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729200&view=rev
Log:
Commit approved fix
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ha/tcp/ReplicationValve.java
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/w
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Dec 23 17:58:37 2008
New Revision: 729192
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729192&view=rev
Log:
proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=72
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Dec 23 17:57:36 2008
New Revision: 729191
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729191&view=rev
Log:
Fix file descriptor leak
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.ja
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
--- Comment #3 from Jochen Wuttke 2008-12-23 10:50:26
PST ---
Cool. Thanks for checking.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas 2008-12-23 10:32:22 PST ---
There is some inefficient use of memory here but no leak. Some tags are
incorrectly placed in the pool (I have a patch for that) but all instances are
released when the web ap
Author: markt
Date: Tue Dec 23 10:32:15 2008
New Revision: 729058
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729058&view=rev
Log:
Propose fix for 46397
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATU
Author: markt
Date: Tue Dec 23 10:31:04 2008
New Revision: 729057
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729057&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
Don't pool tag instances that implement JspIdConsumer
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compile
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2008-12-23 08:34:04 PST ---
The test case you have provided doesn't do anything. There is no web.xml and no
static content. Is there an index.jsp or similar missing?
I should be able to generate a simpl
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Kolinko 2008-12-23
08:04:43 PST ---
For reference:
The JDK bug 6403933 (mentioned in message which is referenced in comment #3) is
mentioned as fixed in JDK 6u4 release notes,
http://java.sun.com/javase
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46400
Konstantin Kolinko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|jspc does not work correctly|jspc does not work correctly
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46400
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43150
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hrend...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
>>> concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
>>> contexts).
>>> Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
> concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
> contexts).
> Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
> there another way to explain it)?
> S
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain it)?
See http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42693
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas 2008-12-23 05:24:11 PST ---
This has now been proposed for 6.0.x
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|enhancement
Status|ASSI
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46403
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas 2008-12-23 05:19:48 PST ---
For completeness, the cookie parsing changes were required to correct various
security vulnerabilities.
I really don't like the idea of adding work arounds to Tomcat for bugs
Author: markt
Date: Tue Dec 23 05:16:06 2008
New Revision: 728948
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=728948&view=rev
Log:
Propose fix for 46403
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATU
Author: markt
Date: Tue Dec 23 05:14:42 2008
New Revision: 728947
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=728947&view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46403
By default, always send the expires parameter with cookies to fix know IE6 and
IE 7 issue.
I don't like doing t
26 matches
Mail list logo
