Re: AntiResourceLocking Side Effect

2008-09-18 Thread Jonathan Holloway
I can't say I have seen this issue having not deployed on AIX. This problem was specifically on Windows and Linux (the actual side effect I saw). It doesn't sound like it's permissions based since the files you mention are actually created. If you're starting tomcat via the sh file under AIX try

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45840] Issue : 44860 : Cookie problem exists in 5.5.26

2008-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45840 Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: svn commit: r696780 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/parser/ELParser.jjt

2008-09-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 19:42 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: markt > Date: Thu Sep 18 12:42:54 2008 > New Revision: 696780 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696780&view=rev > Log: > Add explicit lookaheads where they could be ambiguity. This resolves some TCK > failures with the

Re: AntiResourceLocking Side Effect

2008-09-18 Thread Vikas Sharma
Hi Jonathan, I also used antiResourceLocking flag in context.xml. Once the flag is set to true, Tomcat starts exploding web application in temp directory. It works well for me in Linux and Windows environment, but in AIX, I cannot even start tomcat with antiResourceLocking flag set to true. Wh

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45840] New: Issue : 44860 : Cookie problem exists in 5.5.26

2008-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45840 Summary: Issue : 44860 : Cookie problem exists in 5.5.26 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.27 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority

svn commit: r696812 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Sep 18 14:22:19 2008 New Revision: 696812 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696812&view=rev Log: Proposals Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=69

svn commit: r696810 - in /tomcat/trunk/java: javax/el/ javax/servlet/ org/apache/catalina/ha/ org/apache/catalina/ha/session/ org/apache/catalina/ha/tcp/ org/apache/catalina/manager/host/ org/apache/c

2008-09-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Sep 18 14:18:41 2008 New Revision: 696810 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696810&view=rev Log: More Spanish translations Added: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/el/LocalStrings_es.properties (with props) tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/LocalStrings_es.properties (

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45837] New: page implicit object typed as Object instead of HttpJspPage

2008-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45837 Summary: page implicit object typed as Object instead of HttpJspPage Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.18 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW

EL and TCK

2008-09-18 Thread Mark Thomas
With the recent fixes to the EL code it appears that there is a bug in the TCK. I won't repeat the exact test since the TCK licence won't let me do that but a simple version is that the TCK thinks the following expression should be valid: ${\'string literal\'} For those of you with access to the

svn commit: r696782 [2/2] - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/parser: ELParser.java ELParserConstants.java ELParserTokenManager.java ELParserTreeConstants.java JJTELParserState.java ParseException.j

2008-09-18 Thread markt
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/parser/ELParserTokenManager.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/parser/ELParserTokenManager.java?rev=696782&r1=696781&r2=696782&view=diff == ---

svn commit: r696780 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/parser/ELParser.jjt

2008-09-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Sep 18 12:42:54 2008 New Revision: 696780 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696780&view=rev Log: Add explicit lookaheads where they could be ambiguity. This resolves some TCK failures with the fix for 42565. Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/parser/ELParse

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:27 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> My questions are trying to understand the timing. Basically whether a) >> 6.0.18 went out with TCK failures or b) you fixed the failures as part of >> the 6.0.18 release or c) some change in svn post 6.0.18 caused the

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:27 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > My questions are trying to understand the timing. Basically whether a) > 6.0.18 went out with TCK failures or b) you fixed the failures as part of > the 6.0.18 release or c) some change in svn post 6.0.18 caused the > failures. It wasn't clea

svn commit: r696716 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/ExpressionBuilder.java

2008-09-18 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu Sep 18 10:08:10 2008 New Revision: 696716 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696716&view=rev Log: Fix ClassCastException when we try to cast a NullPointerException to an ELException. I still need to investigate where the NPE came from, but simply casting seems unsafe in

svn commit: r696714 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang: ExpressionBuilder.java FunctionMapperImpl.java VariableMapperImpl.java

2008-09-18 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu Sep 18 10:03:38 2008 New Revision: 696714 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696714&view=rev Log: Use generics to improve type safetyness. Please check readExternal() in FunctionMapperImpl and VariableMapperImpl. The type of the persisted Map has changed. Does this pose

svn commit: r696702 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el: ./ lang/ parser/ util/

2008-09-18 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Thu Sep 18 09:48:10 2008 New Revision: 696702 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696702&view=rev Log: Tab police and trailing whitespace deletion for package a.o.el (except for generated java files). Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/MethodExpressionLiteral.java

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:34 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Did you include that in the 6.0.18 release or was it just something you did >> locally? > > I did my hacking only a few days ago. I don't understand you questions. My questions are trying to understand the timing. Ba

svn commit: r696683 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread pero
Author: pero Date: Thu Sep 18 09:04:19 2008 New Revision: 696683 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696683&view=rev Log: Cast my vote Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=

svn commit: r696680 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Thu Sep 18 08:53:56 2008 New Revision: 696680 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696680&view=rev Log: - Votes. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=6966

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:34 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > Did you include that in the 6.0.18 release or was it just something you did > locally? I did my hacking only a few days ago. I don't understand you questions. Rémy - To u

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 15:44 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> If you used a newer javacc and/or changed the lookahead for the 6.0.18 >> release that would have resulted in updated .java files. So again, my >> question is why aren't the updated .java files in svn. > > Because as

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 15:44 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > If you used a newer javacc and/or changed the lookahead for the 6.0.18 > release that would have resulted in updated .java files. So again, my > question is why aren't the updated .java files in svn. Because as I said, I don't wish to. I have

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:41 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Remy Maucherat wrote: >>> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + markt: No change in the TCK results with this patch. We have the + same EL related failures we have wit

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:41 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> + markt: No change in the TCK results with this patch. We have the > >> + same EL related failures we have without the patch. I'll > >>

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45832] add DIGEST authentication support to Ant tasks

2008-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45832 --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-18 06:46:57 PST --- Personally, I'd rather not add a dependency just for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You a

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> + markt: No change in the TCK results with this patch. We have the >> + same EL related failures we have without the patch. I'll >> + look into them as separate issues. > > I fixed t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45832] add DIGEST authentication support to Ant tasks

2008-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45832 --- Comment #2 from Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-18 06:35:33 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) > Patches are always welcome. Is it ok to use something like commons-httpclient that does Digest auth? -- Configure bugmail:

Re: svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > + markt: No change in the TCK results with this patch. We have the > + same EL related failures we have without the patch. I'll > + look into them as separate issues. I fixed these by regenerating with a new

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45832] add DIGEST authentication support to Ant tasks

2008-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45832 Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement -

svn commit: r696650 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-09-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Thu Sep 18 05:49:59 2008 New Revision: 696650 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696650&view=rev Log: Update with TCK results - no change with/without patch Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45832] New: add DIGEST authentication support to Ant tasks

2008-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45832 Summary: add DIGEST authentication support to Ant tasks Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.18 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45812] No EOS bucket when using mod_jk with 401 response

2008-09-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45812 Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

svn commit: r696607 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c

2008-09-18 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Thu Sep 18 02:06:41 2008 New Revision: 696607 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696607&view=rev Log: Favor done() instead flush() if available. This will send EOS instead FLUSH+EOS Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c Modified: tomcat/con