Tomcat 6 Valves Development

2008-03-18 Thread Hemant Malik
Hi all, I am looking for some reference material or tutorial over net on how to begin with development of my own tomcat 6 valves. I have started looking at a book which is for tomcat 5 and it seems to import following from catalina.jar import org.apache.catalina.HttpResponse; import org.apache.cat

svn commit: r638696 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Tue Mar 18 20:55:49 2008 New Revision: 638696 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=638696&view=rev Log: proposed simplified cookie backwards compatible patch Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/

svn commit: r638695 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/ServerCookie.java

2008-03-18 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Tue Mar 18 20:46:17 2008 New Revision: 638695 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=638695&view=rev Log: Only allow version switching on the "value" of the cookie, for the rest, just quote like we did in the past. this becomes the most backwards compatible with old behavior

svn commit: r638652 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Mar 18 17:12:31 2008 New Revision: 638652 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=638652&view=rev Log: Remove alternative patch that still has issues. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/

Re: svn commit: r638442 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what it was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the "value" of the cookie, bu

Re: svn commit: r638442 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 16:05 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: > > Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > >> this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what > >> it was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the > >> "value" of the cookie, b

Re: svn commit: r638442 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what it was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the "value" of the cookie, but they are not correct for the "

Re: svn commit: r638442 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what it was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the "value" of the cookie, but they are not correct for the "path" I'm not conv

Re: svn commit: r638442 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Mark Thomas wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what it was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the "value" of the cookie, but they are not correct for the "path" I'm not convinced of this yet. I am doing so

Re: svn commit: r638442 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what it was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the "value" of the cookie, but they are not correct for the "path" I'm not convinced of this yet. I am doing some more testing but

Re: Cookie standards

2008-03-18 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
tomcat doesn't use that spec, we use http://wp.netscape.com/newsref/std/cookie_spec.html http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2109.html not sure how many browsers are actually up to 2965 yet Filip William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The standard is only 7 1/2 years old; http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2965 Jim Ma

Re: Cookie standards

2008-03-18 Thread Julian Reschke
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The standard is only 7 1/2 years old; http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2965 But that's for "Cookie2" (the thing people should use), not "Cookie" (the thing people *do* use). BR, Julian - To unsubscrib

svn commit: r638551 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Tue Mar 18 13:19:41 2008 New Revision: 638551 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=638551&view=rev Log: vote Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt?rev=

svn commit: r638548 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Tue Mar 18 13:01:36 2008 New Revision: 638548 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=638548&view=rev Log: votes Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=63854

svn commit: r638546 - in /tomcat: container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/WebRuleSet.java current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Tue Mar 18 12:58:29 2008 New Revision: 638546 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=638546&view=rev Log: Apply patch Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/WebRuleSet.java tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat

Re: Cookie standards

2008-03-18 Thread Jim Manico
Right, but are there any active cookie standards that can be amended? 7 /12 year old standards are not very valid or useful in the fast-moving internut world. - Jim The standard is only 7 1/2 years old; http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2965 Jim Manico wrote: According to Daniel Stenberg, Cookies

Re: Cookie standards

2008-03-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
The standard is only 7 1/2 years old; http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2965 Jim Manico wrote: According to Daniel Stenberg, Cookies are not even *mentioned* in RFC2616 Per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2008JanMar/0623.html "On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Jim Manico wrote: > Are there any

Cookie standards

2008-03-18 Thread Jim Manico
According to Daniel Stenberg, Cookies are not even *mentioned* in RFC2616 Per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2008JanMar/0623.html "On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Jim Manico wrote: > Are there any efforts underway to support the HttpOnly cookie directive > within any version of the HTTP

Re: svn commit: r638442 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
this wont work either. for the value of the cookie, it must be what it was before. tspecials2. those are the correct characters for the "value" of the cookie, but they are not correct for the "path" the problem is how browsers work (or not work for that matter). for example, browsers will acce

svn commit: r638442 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Mar 18 10:04:22 2008 New Revision: 638442 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=638442&view=rev Log: Withdraw previous alternative proposal and replace with an improved patch that addresses the concerns raised. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomc

Re: svn commit: r634863 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-03-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: The version switch is activated by a greater set of characters than it really needs to be. I should be able to modify my patch to only switch when there are characters in a v1 cookie that will cause problems. I'll try and look at this tomorrow

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44624] Tomcat stopping

2008-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44624 Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44624] Tomcat stopping

2008-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44624 Ratul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44624] New: Tomcat stopping

2008-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44624 Summary: Tomcat stopping Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.23 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Server 2003 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Comp