Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Tomcat 5.0.x to the archive

+1 2007/10/19, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hey, > > On 10/18/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to propose that we have reached the time where Tomcat > > 5.0.x should be archived. What this means in practice is: > > +1. > > Yoav > >

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "PoweredBy" by AndrewBruno

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by AndrewBruno: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/PoweredBy -- [http://www.

Re: svn commit: r586165 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Mark, I've modified my patch to not remove the AL2 license Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 18 15:59:55 2007 New Revision: 586165 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586165&view=rev Log: Add further cookies patch Add votes Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

svn commit: r586232 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Oct 18 19:23:32 2007 New Revision: 586232 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586232&view=rev Log: MD5 proposed fix as the old files look kind of ugly with the unexpanded variable in there Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

svn commit: r586228 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/catalina/loader/ java/org/apache/catalina/startup/ java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/membership/ java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/ java/

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Oct 18 19:16:41 2007 New Revision: 586228 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586228&view=rev Log: Add in voted on fixes Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/mbeans-descriptors.xml tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/j

svn commit: r586225 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Oct 18 19:09:21 2007 New Revision: 586225 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586225&view=rev Log: Added vote, and corrected mvn.properties.default (added back AL2 license to property file) Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATU

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Tomcat 5.0.x to the archive

Hey, On 10/18/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to propose that we have reached the time where Tomcat > 5.0.x should be archived. What this means in practice is: +1. Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43656] New: - ELSupport.coerceToType modifies BigDecimal Values

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[PROPOSAL] Move Tomcat 5.0.x to the archive

All, I would like to propose that we have reached the time where Tomcat 5.0.x should be archived. What this means in practice is: - Sending an announcement out that no further work, including security patches will be performed on 5.0.x. Current 5.0.x users are encouraged to upgrade to 5.5.x or, i

svn commit: r586174 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/security-5.html xdocs/security-5.xml

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 18 16:19:59 2007 New Revision: 586174 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586174&view=rev Log: Update status of webdav fix Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.html tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/security-5.xml Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.htm

svn commit: r586168 - in /tomcat: container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets/WebdavServlet.java container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml current/tc5.5.x/STATUS

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 18 16:13:55 2007 New Revision: 586168 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586168&view=rev Log: Apply fix for webdav info disclosure Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets/WebdavServlet.java tomcat/container/tc5.5.x

svn commit: r586165 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 18 15:59:55 2007 New Revision: 586165 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586165&view=rev Log: Add further cookies patch Add votes Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43424] - MD5 files for 6.0.14 contain unexpanded "${md5sum.binary-prefix}"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/17/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Shemansky wrote: > > Key features that may be useful to us are : > > > > - The Standard Directory Layout - Specifically, multi-module builds. > > This might make managing individual components easier for catalina, > > coyote, naming, jsp/se

svn commit: r586128 - /tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/build.properties.default

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Oct 18 13:36:13 2007 New Revision: 586128 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586128&view=rev Log: update JDT version, forward port from 6.0 Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/build.properties.default Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/build.properties.default URL: http

svn commit: r586127 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Oct 18 13:33:11 2007 New Revision: 586127 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586127&view=rev Log: Add votes Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS?rev=586127&

svn commit: r586125 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: yoavs Date: Thu Oct 18 13:30:46 2007 New Revision: 586125 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586125&view=rev Log: Add my comments on STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?re

svn commit: r586122 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS

Author: yoavs Date: Thu Oct 18 13:27:40 2007 New Revision: 586122 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586122&view=rev Log: Add my +1s to STATUS Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS?r

svn commit: r586121 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Oct 18 13:25:28 2007 New Revision: 586121 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586121&view=rev Log: Proposed enhancement to the maven ant script Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6

Re: New tag

We have about 7 items left in STATUS, some bug fixes very important, I'd hope folks would want to look them all over and cast a vote, before we tag. RTC is not lazy consenus, so in order for it to work, folks must vote :) Filip Yoav Shapira wrote: Hey, On 10/18/07, Rémy Maucherat <[EMAIL P

svn commit: r586110 - /tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Oct 18 13:09:00 2007 New Revision: 586110 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586110&view=rev Log: Add info about JAR files that need to be used when doing this Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/res/maven/mvn-pub.xml Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/res/maven/mvn-pub.

Re: New tag

Hey, On 10/18/07, Rémy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I stated a couple weeks ago, I think a new tag is needed. As a > result, I propose creating a 6.0.15 tag at the end of this week (late > Friday). +1. Yoav - To un

New tag

Hi, As I stated a couple weeks ago, I think a new tag is needed. As a result, I propose creating a 6.0.15 tag at the end of this week (late Friday). Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-m

svn commit: r586103 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Oct 18 12:43:06 2007 New Revision: 586103 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586103&view=rev Log: proposed bug fix Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS?rev=586103

svn commit: r586102 - in /tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x: java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SecureNioChannel.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: fhanik Date: Thu Oct 18 12:41:39 2007 New Revision: 586102 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586102&view=rev Log: Fix for http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653 Modified: tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SecureNioChannel.java tomcat/sandbo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/18/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/17/07, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But if you want to create a maven build file ( or a Makefile, or > > eclipse/netbeans projects, etc :-) that builds tomcat - I personally > don't > > see a problem with that - as

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43653] New: - NIO connector may corrupt first line of HTTP response

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r586031 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: STATUS build.properties.default

Author: remm Date: Thu Oct 18 09:46:58 2007 New Revision: 586031 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=586031&view=rev Log: - Update to JDT 3.3 (really, this time). Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS U

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/17/07, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But if you want to create a maven build file ( or a Makefile, or > eclipse/netbeans projects, etc :-) that builds tomcat - I personally don't > see a problem with that - as long as it doesn't require moving code around > and can play nicely

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

If nothing else comes out of this discussion thread, we will at least hear build-process opinions from above-average developers. Thank you in advance to all that reply. In response to Filip : On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > lemme give you my feedback and some hi

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > to elaborate more for you, 6.0.x is our current 6.0 release branch. > We are using RTC, Review-Then-Commit policy here, and introducing maven > into a stable release branch like this, is probably not the best idea. > What you should

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Remy, do you think that it would be acceptable as a test branch (proving ground), a possible integration into a near-future release, or do you believe that Maven is just not acceptable at all for Tomcat? On 10/17/07, Rémy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:21 -0400, Pa

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Paul, I agree with Costin. -1 to default +1 to alternative Some points: 1. I would be a willing tester. 2. Please make sure versions are put on every plugin / dependency. 3. I have a love/hate relationship with maven. It sort of scares me. Debugging maven hurts. 4. On the positive side, I lik

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Wendy Smoak wrote: On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We currently have a "distribute to Maven repo" in place. The most current version is in the sandbox, that would allow us to publish to the central ASF repo with signed JAR's. This allows(will allow) other proj

Re: Mavenization (M10N) of Tomcat Build Process - Should Tomcat Be Migrated to Maven 2?

Gentoo's vote -1 for Tomcat using Maven to build instead of Ant :) On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 23:26 -0700, Bill Barker wrote: > I'm pretty much going to agree with Costin on this one. I have no objection > to having a maven build as an alternative to the ant build (assuming that it > can do the same

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42866] - Using a function via EL produces ClassNotFoundException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43622] - compression / minCompressionSize attribute not properly implemented

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r585934 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: STATUS java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/WebdavServlet.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 18 04:44:53 2007 New Revision: 585934 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585934&view=rev Log: Fix CVE-2007-5461. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/servlets/WebdavServlet.java tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/

svn commit: r585933 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/security-4.html docs/security-5.html docs/security-6.html xdocs/security-4.xml xdocs/security-5.xml xdocs/security-6.xml

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 18 04:39:34 2007 New Revision: 585933 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585933&view=rev Log: Add webdav issue - CVE-2007-5461 Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-4.html tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-5.html tomcat/site/trunk/docs/security-6.html

svn commit: r585930 - /tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 18 04:14:13 2007 New Revision: 585930 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585930&view=rev Log: Add status file to 4.1.x with WebDAV fix proposal Added: tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS Added: tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/c

svn commit: r585931 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS

Author: markt Date: Thu Oct 18 04:14:33 2007 New Revision: 585931 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=585931&view=rev Log: Add webdav fix to TC5.5 Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATU

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43647] New: - Content-Type changes unexpectedly from text/html to text/plain

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu