Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2007/09/23]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2007/09/23]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Watchdog [2007/09/23]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2007/09/23]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "AxisProjectPages/Tomcat" by markt

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by markt: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/AxisProjectPages/Tomcat The comment on the change is: Orphaned page. Very out of date. -

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "TomcatWeb/Jk2Generic" by markt

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by markt: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatWeb/Jk2Generic The comment on the change is: Orphaned page. jk2 is deprecated. ---

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "WikiDiscussion" by markt

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by markt: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/WikiDiscussion The comment on the change is: Orphaned page. Suggestion already implemented.

[Tomcat Wiki] Update of "TomcatVersions" by markt

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Tomcat Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by markt: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions The comment on the change is: Add remaining versions. List TBDs specifically. ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43453] - ClassCastException at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(int)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43453] - ClassCastException at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(int)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r578613 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: funkman Date: Sun Sep 23 16:53:05 2007 New Revision: 578613 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578613&view=rev Log: bug 43453: ClassCastException at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(int) In reality - I don't see anywhere that calls findStatusPage(). Is there a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41797] - CNFE/NPE thrown from function mapper when externalizing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r578610 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/FunctionMapperImpl.java

Author: funkman Date: Sun Sep 23 16:33:56 2007 New Revision: 578610 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578610&view=rev Log: bug 41797: CNFE/NPE thrown from function mapper when externalizing Patch by Tuomas Kiviaho- tuomas.kiviahos at ikis fi (submit part2 of the patch as seem in comment #3) (

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43453] New: - ClassCastException at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.findStatusPage(int)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

jean-frederic clere wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> - There is only one dev branch. I am -1 for creating separate dev >> branches for 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x and 5.5.x on the grounds it is too much >> overhead for branches that are in maintenance mode where 99% of the >> patch

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

+1 2007/9/23, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns > >>>as well as the problems which started this whole > >>>thing. > >>>[ ] 0. Whatever. > >>>[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns as well as the problems which started this whole thing. [ ] 0. Whatever. [ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: I agree with Remy: We must find a process that really work normally quick

Re: Could two tomcat have mutual authentication?

quanxin zhu wrote: > I setup a tomcat server 1 using client authentication, and deployed a > webservice on it. > So, when invoke the webservice, a certification is needed. > In server 2 , I want a servlet to invoke the webservice in server 1. > could server 2 automatically provide its certification

Could two tomcat have mutual authentication?

I setup a tomcat server 1 using client authentication, and deployed a webservice on it. So, when invoke the webservice, a certification is needed. In server 2 , I want a servlet to invoke the webservice in server 1. could server 2 automatically provide its certification to tomcat 1 when invoke webs

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

Jim Jagielski schrieb: >[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns >as well as the problems which started this whole >thing. >[ ] 0. Whatever. >[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: --

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

Mark Thomas wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > >[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns > >as well as the problems which started this whole > >thing. > >[ ] 0. Whatever. > >[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: > > > > With

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

Mladen Turk wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > >[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns > >as well as the problems which started this whole > >thing. > >[ ] 0. Whatever. > >[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: > >

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

Mark Thomas wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >>[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns >>as well as the problems which started this whole >>thing. >>[ ] 0. Whatever. >>[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: >> > > With the follow

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

+1 Cheers Jean-Frederic > >[ ] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns >as well as the problems which started this whole >thing. >[ ] 0. Whatever. >[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: > > The vote will run for 96 hours inst

Re: [VOTE] Back to ASF Basics (Was: Re: Review model take 2)

Mark Thomas wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: [X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns as well as the problems which started this whole thing. [ ] 0. Whatever. [ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: With the following caveats: - The