Re: Bug in B2C converter WAS: svn commit: r568307 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java

"Filip Hanik - Dev Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Bill Barker wrote: >> "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >>> Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here. http://pe

Re: [poll] mod_jk for i5/OS / V5R4 mini

> My trusted information sources concerning i5/OS (yes, such exist :) ) Sure :) > tell me, that it's quite common out there to not support R3 any more. Well yes > On the other hand: if we really get enough benefit from dropping support > during 1.2 now and not for the next major version, is unc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43191] New: - compressableMimeType attribute ignored

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r568742 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/GroupChannel.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Aug 22 13:19:54 2007 New Revision: 568742 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=568742&view=rev Log: backport from trunk Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/GroupChannel.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tr

svn commit: r568741 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/GroupChannel.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Aug 22 13:18:35 2007 New Revision: 568741 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=568741&view=rev Log: Log deserialization errors as error log channellistener errors as warnings Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/GroupChannel.java Modified: t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43188] New: - Trailing space in java system properties tomcat6w.exe

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bug in B2C converter WAS: svn commit: r568307 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java

Bill Barker wrote: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here. http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/ This is what is happening int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: IMO, code talks, bullshit walks. And I've been on both sides of the argument many times in many places. Yeah right. So to summarize, we have 3 committers who are happy campers (2 of them which do

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: IMO, code talks, bullshit walks. And I've been on both sides of the argument many times in many places. Yeah right. So to summarize, we have 3 committers who are happy campers (2 of them which don't contribute much, as

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

Remy Maucherat wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: IMO, code talks, bullshit walks. And I've been on both sides of the argument many times in many places. Yeah right. So to summarize, we have 3 committers who are happy campers (2 of them which don't contribute much, as far as I know), and the rest o

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

Paul McMahan wrote: On Aug 20, 2007, at 3:43 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: +0, could we see the pros and cons ? One "con" of moving trunk to sandbox, at least from an ASF-wide perspective, is that the annotation processing changes that Geronimo 2.0 relies on are currently only available in trunk.

svn commit: r568702 - /tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/test/membership/NamedNodes.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Aug 22 10:07:01 2007 New Revision: 568702 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=568702&view=rev Log: Added license header Modified: tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/test/membership/NamedNodes.java Modified: tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/te

svn commit: r568699 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Aug 22 09:57:13 2007 New Revision: 568699 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=568699&view=rev Log: Fix broken UTF-8 handling, the B2CConverter doesn't respect that the entire message doesn't fit in the buffer. this fix takes care of that by checking the buffer, if no da

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

On Aug 20, 2007, at 3:43 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: +0, could we see the pros and cons ? One "con" of moving trunk to sandbox, at least from an ASF-wide perspective, is that the annotation processing changes that Geronimo 2.0 relies on are currently only available in trunk. The development o

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:43 AM, David Jencks wrote: While it's more fun to watch from the sidelines, I'm afraid I'll have to get involved here to point out that you are wrong about this. trunk contains an entirely new and incompatible with 6.0.x annotation processing framework which is in

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

On Aug 22, 2007, at 8:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Yeah right. So to summarize, we have 3 committers who are happy campers (2 of them which don't contribute much, as far as I know), and the rest of the committers are either do not care or are unhappy. Most also wa

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

> Remy Maucherat wrote: > Yeah right. So to summarize, we have 3 committers who are happy campers > (2 of them which don't contribute much, as far as I know), and the rest > of the committers are either do not care or are unhappy. Most also want > a change in the development process, and as long as

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

On Aug 22, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: IMO, code talks, bullshit walks. And I've been on both sides of the argument many times in many places. Yeah right. And what do you mean by that? What is "Yeah right" about me claiming to at times being on the 'code t

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

Jim Jagielski wrote: IMO, code talks, bullshit walks. And I've been on both sides of the argument many times in many places. Yeah right. So to summarize, we have 3 committers who are happy campers (2 of them which don't contribute much, as far as I know), and the rest of the committers are ei

Re: Bug in B2C converter WAS: svn commit: r568307 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java

On Aug 22, 2007, at 9:32 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: and so the pissing contest begins, just in a different area. ok, the so the only thing required for the fix is 1. available() call on the intermediate stream 2. make sure the B2CConverter uses while(available) in

svn commit: r568631 - /tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/test/membership/NamedNodes.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Aug 22 07:43:08 2007 New Revision: 568631 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=568631&view=rev Log: Added example on how you can name nodes with existing system Added: tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/tribes/test/membership/NamedNodes.java Added: tomcat/trunk/

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

On Aug 21, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: Hey, On 8/21/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Beyond withdrawing the silly vote, asking for the code you veto to be removed, and moving forward, don't you think you should hold a vote to make trunk R-T-C first? The latte

Re: [VOTE] Send trunk to the sandbox

Mark Thomas wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Bill Barker wrote: I'm so tired of this thread, so let's settle it once and for all. I'm backing Remy's suggestion to send the current trunk to the sandbox: [X] +1 Let's end the revolution [ ] +0 What revolution? [ ] -1 Viva the revolultion

Re: Bug in B2C converter WAS: svn commit: r568307 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java

Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: and so the pissing contest begins, just in a different area. ok, the so the only thing required for the fix is 1. available() call on the intermediate stream 2. make sure the B2CConverter uses while(available) instead of while(true) here is

Re: Bug in B2C converter WAS: svn commit: r568307 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: and so the pissing contest begins, just in a different area. ok, the so the only thing required for the fix is 1. available() call on the intermediate stream 2. make sure the B2CConverter uses while(available) instead of while(true) here is the 5.5 patch (had you a

svn commit: r568605 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Aug 22 06:29:21 2007 New Revision: 568605 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=568605&view=rev Log: remove non needed methods, somehow they cause an itch, so lets get rid of the itch Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java Modified:

Re: Bug in B2C converter WAS: svn commit: r568307 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/B2CConverter.java

Bill Barker wrote: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Test Case and 5.5.x patch can be found here. http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/b2c/ This is what is happening int cnt=conv.read( result, 0, BUFFER_SIZE

Re: [poll] mod_jk for i5/OS / V5R4 mini

My trusted information sources concerning i5/OS (yes, such exist :) ) tell me, that it's quite common out there to not support R3 any more. On the other hand: if we really get enough benefit from dropping support during 1.2 now and not for the next major version, is unclear to me. This mainly