svn commit: r541206 - /tomcat/trunk/bin/service.bat

2007-05-23 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Wed May 23 23:56:59 2007 New Revision: 541206 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=541206 Log: Automatically detect CPU and 64-bit JVM version. This allows to install the proper service wrapper for the JVM and CPU used. Modified: tomcat/trunk/bin/service.bat Mo

svn commit: r541204 - /tomcat/trunk/dist.xml

2007-05-23 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Wed May 23 23:54:44 2007 New Revision: 541204 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=541204 Log: Add windows service binaries to the .zip distribution. The rule can be excluded by defining exclude.service.binaries in build.properties file. Service binaries included are

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41749] - Tomcat with APR using SSL spins CPU at 100%

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42503] - ServletContext.getResourceAsStream returns stale data

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42503] - ServletContext.getResourceAsStream returns stale data

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42503] - ServletContext.getResourceAsStream returns stale data

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42503] New: - ServletContext.getResourceAsStream returns stale data

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Versioning in sources

2007-05-23 Thread Remy Maucherat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: aah, that makes sense. Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too. in there you override any properties needed. That is why all binary builds are correct, but your build isn't. what y

Re: Versioning in sources

2007-05-23 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 19:46 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > aah, that makes sense. > > Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own > build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too. > in there you override any properties needed. That is why all binary > build

Re: Versioning in sources

2007-05-23 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
aah, that makes sense. Remember that the release manager is carrying his/her own build.properties, and if you build from source, you should too. in there you override any properties needed. That is why all binary builds are correct, but your build isn't. what you are asking for is that we upd

Re: Versioning in sources

2007-05-23 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
Filip, On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:37 +0200, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > hey William, what are you referring to? any specific .java files that > need a version number? Sorry should have been more specific, the problem lies in build.properties.default > I was under the impression that we only

Re: Announcing releases of tomcat native

2007-05-23 Thread Mladen Turk
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:19 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: For 6.0.13 the required version is 1.1.8 and recommended is 1.1.10 and that is clearly printed whenever Tomcat is started. I'm not sure what more is needed. According to the bug report, it required 1.1.10, and

Re: Versioning in sources

2007-05-23 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
hey William, what are you referring to? any specific .java files that need a version number? I was under the impression that we only tag each build, and then there is a small sucker in a property file that we swap out. ie, when you start 5.5.23 then you see May 23, 2007 6:35:55 PM org.apache.c

Versioning in sources

2007-05-23 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
I could have swarn this was brought up recently but could not find mention of it in archives. Guess I should file a bug on it, but it's kinda a moot issue. It seems the sources for 6.0.x have not really been versioned. I have noticed it myself on occasion, but never cared enough to comment or etc.

Re: Publishing JAR's to Maven

2007-05-23 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Niall Pemberton wrote: On 5/23/07, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Just wanted to say thanks. :-) +1 - this is great. I think the ant tasks have different naming conventions, I believe the jars get renamed on the way up. just an fyi Filip -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42497] - 304 response should consistently include ETag header

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42497] New: - 304 response should consistently include ETag header

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r540981 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache: catalina/CometEvent.java catalina/connector/CometEventImpl.java coyote/ActionCode.java coyote/http11/Http11AprProcessor.java

2007-05-23 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Wed May 23 08:49:36 2007 New Revision: 540981 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=540981 Log: - Revert the API changes in the 6.0.x branch. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/CometEvent.java tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/c

svn commit: r540979 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java

2007-05-23 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Wed May 23 08:44:33 2007 New Revision: 540979 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=540979 Log: - NPE check (when using JMX, if I remember correctly). Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk

Re: Announcing releases of tomcat native

2007-05-23 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 15:18 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: > > I think he's trying to provide packages for a distro. So he wants to > provide 1.1.8, 1.1.9, 1.1.10, ... whenever they are released (available). 100% Correct :) -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: Announcing releases of tomcat native

2007-05-23 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:19 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > > For 6.0.13 the required version is 1.1.8 and recommended > is 1.1.10 and that is clearly printed whenever Tomcat is started. > I'm not sure what more is needed. According to the bug report, it required 1.1.10, and Tomcat failed to start wit

Re: Announcing releases of tomcat native

2007-05-23 Thread Jess Holle
In general it is not very easy to even notice when new stable tcnative versions become available. For instance, discovering that 1.1.10 is out, what changed since 1.1.8, and verifying that it is intended to work with 5.5.23 are not very trivial from the web site currently... Rainer Jung wrot

Re: Publishing JAR's to Maven

2007-05-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 5/23/07, Sebastiaan van Erk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Just wanted to say thanks. :-) +1 - this is great. Niall Regards, Sebastiaan Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Ok, I think I'm done, just need to document the very messy way of > setting this up. > > BTW, I published 6.0.13 to th

Re: Announcing releases of tomcat native

2007-05-23 Thread Rainer Jung
Mladen Turk wrote: It is part of Tomcat release and that shouldn't change. Each tomcat release has a detection of the Tomcat native, and it prints out the suggested version compared with the one user is running. For 6.0.13 the required version is 1.1.8 and recommended is 1.1.10 and that is clear

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42494] - local JNDI context indefinitely caches objects from custom object factories

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42494] - local JNDI context indefinitely caches objects from custom object factories

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42494] New: - local JNDI context indefinitely caches objects from custom object factories

2007-05-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Announcing releases of tomcat native

2007-05-23 Thread Mladen Turk
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, On 5/22/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If possible when new versions of Tomcat native be announced on list? Seems Tomcat 6.0.13 requires 1.1.10. First I became aware of it, was when user reported the problem. Granted I should have discovered it bef

Re: Publishing JAR's to Maven

2007-05-23 Thread Sebastiaan van Erk
Hi, Just wanted to say thanks. :-) Regards, Sebastiaan Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Ok, I think I'm done, just need to document the very messy way of setting this up. BTW, I published 6.0.13 to the staging and the main repository. I built the extras from the trunk, as I don't think there