DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42438] - Duplicate JSP temp variable declaration when jsp:attribute used in conjunction with custom tags

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42438] New: - Duplicate JSP temp variable declaration when jsp:attribute used in conjunction with custom tags

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42314] - Jasper output no details with compilation error in specific case.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42435] - Insufficient error report from Jasper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

On May 16, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Paul McMahan wrote: On Apr 12, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: David Jencks wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/ GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad id

Re: Annotation processing - Geronimo injection

On Apr 12, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: David Jencks wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/ GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad idea because it forces jasper to use an interface sh

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42436] - service-qname and soap-header not parsed correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42436] - service-qname and soap-header not parsed correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42436] New: - service-qname and soap-header not parsed correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r538609 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/jkstatus/example/show.txt

Author: jfclere Date: Wed May 16 07:18:14 2007 New Revision: 538609 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538609 Log: Just some instructions how to use it. Added: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/jkstatus/example/show.txt Added: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/jkstatus/example/show.txt URL: h

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42435] New: - Insufficient error report from Jasper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42433] - configuration of bugzilla with tomcat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Changing JK_OPT_FWDURIDEFAULT to JK_OPT_FWDURICOMPATUNPARSED

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:17 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: > >> Why do you think the default is bad? > > > > Because it breaks the spec's and allows unexpected handling of url that > > are encoded (for example: /context-A/%252E%252E/context-B that is send > > to Tomcat as /context-A/%2E%2E/context-B an

Re: More on i5/OS and some modifications needed

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 10:17 +0200, Henri Gomez wrote: > 2007/4/24, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2007/4/24, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The flag is about the response body. We send the response back via a > > > webserver specific method. It's ws_write() ind mod_jk.c. > > > > > > w

Re: Changing JK_OPT_FWDURIDEFAULT to JK_OPT_FWDURICOMPATUNPARSED

Why do you think the default is bad? Because it breaks the spec's and allows unexpected handling of url that are encoded (for example: /context-A/%252E%252E/context-B that is send to Tomcat as /context-A/%2E%2E/context-B and mapped by Tomcat as /context-B). So what how do you suggest to handle

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42434] New: - JSP wraps RuntimeException in ServletException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40056] - added httpHeader after invoking chain.doFilter(..) gets lost by chunked transfer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42419] - Options for changing jsessionid cookie name

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42433] New: - configuration of bugzilla with tomcat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: More on i5/OS and some modifications needed

2007/4/24, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2007/4/24, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The flag is about the response body. We send the response back via a > webserver specific method. It's ws_write() ind mod_jk.c. > > ws_write() calls e.g. ap_rwrite() which should in my opinion set > sent_bod

svn commit: r538461 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

Author: hgomez Date: Wed May 16 00:52:32 2007 New Revision: 538461 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538461 Log: Restore the i5/OS hack Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c URL: http://sv

svn commit: r538459 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

Author: hgomez Date: Wed May 16 00:45:56 2007 New Revision: 538459 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538459 Log: We should take a closer look to this, not only in i5/OS case Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/nati

svn commit: r538457 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

Author: hgomez Date: Wed May 16 00:40:01 2007 New Revision: 538457 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=538457 Log: On i5/OS, we still have the sent_bodyct cleared. Need further investigation by Rochester Lab Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Modified