svn commit: r513218 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/installer/isapi-redirector-win32-msi.ism

Author: mturk Date: Wed Feb 28 23:53:51 2007 New Revision: 513218 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=513218 Log: Change the name to Tomcat Isapi Redirector Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/installer/isapi-redirector-win32-msi.ism Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk

svn commit: r513216 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/installer/isapi-redirector-win32-msi.ism

Author: mturk Date: Wed Feb 28 23:47:15 2007 New Revision: 513216 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=513216 Log: Update Install Shield build project Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/installer/isapi-redirector-win32-msi.ism Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/nat

Specifying relative path for TOMCAT 5.5 ?

Hi, I am using TOMCAT 5.5. I am creating a file in class that is called from a JSP. However, the relative path that I have specified in the class doesn't seem to work. The path that I have used is :"/webapps/Jonathon/WEB-INF/etc/subscriber.txt". Can someone please let me know, what is wrong w

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.21

Rainer Jung wrote: I'm travelin at the moment, otherwise I would have suggested to tag even earlier. Anyone planning to apply important changes to trunk before saturday, please show up now :) No changes. I would like to double check the IIS builds, but the testing will be done by Friday.

Re: reload on demand

Yoav Shapira apache.org> writes: > There's reloadable as a Context attribute, documented at > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/context.html, and you > can also define a list of static resources (not classes) to be watched > to trigger a reload, via the WatchedResources element. See

Re: reload on demand

Hola, On 2/28/07, Kent Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists hanik.com> writes: > personally I don't see a very high value of it. > If I remember correctly, a different approach has already been > implemented using one more layer of classloaders. > you'd need to search around

Re: reload on demand

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists hanik.com> writes: > personally I don't see a very high value of it. > If I remember correctly, a different approach has already been > implemented using one more layer of classloaders. > you'd need to search around or someone might jump in and let you know > where it is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38489] - Frequent Broken Pipe Error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r513080 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: markt Date: Wed Feb 28 16:28:57 2007 New Revision: 513080 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=513080 Log: Update change log Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml URL: http://svn.apache.o

svn commit: r513079 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk: coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/Request.java util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/MimeHeaders.java

Author: markt Date: Wed Feb 28 16:26:12 2007 New Revision: 513079 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=513079 Log: As per RFC2616, requests with multiple content-length headers are invalid. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/Request.java tomcat/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41720] - SSL certificate fails after upgrading to 5.5.17

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 6.0.10 released

Great job all, been waiting so long for this, about wet my pants :) But really my way of saying thanks is by making Tomcat 6.0.10 (release) available on Gentoo. Ebuild was just committed to tree, should hit mirrors and be available for sync ~4hrs or so. So long as no major bugs are filed, will be

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 6.0.10 released

Congrats to you all! This is the first release of Tomcat that I've closely followed from the beginning - both in the dev list and by building it locally and running it and testing certain areas - and I'm very impressed by your teamwork and professionalism. -Scott Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PR

[ANN] Apache Tomcat 6.0.10 released

The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 6.0.10 stable. This release is the first stable release of the 6.0.x branch. Apache Tomcat 6.0 includes new features over Apache Tomcat 5.5, including support for the new Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 specifications, a refacto

svn commit: r513060 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/SocketProperties.java webapps/docs/config/http.xml

Author: fhanik Date: Wed Feb 28 15:28:35 2007 New Revision: 513060 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=513060 Log: By default dont use direct buffers, in a situation where a very large number of connections, direct buffers are much slower Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/ap

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.21

On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 19:34 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi all, > > the feedback from community quality testing for mod_jk 1.2.21 seems to > be OK. Several people did download it on the first day, and we fixed a > minor bug. If things stay like this, I would like to tag and cast the > release v

May Chun Chew/FEA/PEC is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 03/01/2007 and will not return until 03/02/2007. Contactable at (65)97876648. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Accepted meaning of 'should' in spec documents

Awesome. That's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks Tim. --- C. Halstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SourceLabs - http://www.sourcelabs.com Dependable Open Source Systems - "Tim Funk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Typically its: > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2119.html > > -Tim > > C. Halstea

Tagging JK 1.2.21

Hi all, the feedback from community quality testing for mod_jk 1.2.21 seems to be OK. Several people did download it on the first day, and we fixed a minor bug. If things stay like this, I would like to tag and cast the release vote late Saturday, so that we will most likely have the final re

Re: Accepted meaning of 'should' in spec documents

Typically its: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2119.html -Tim C. Halstead wrote: Hi, Just a quick clarification question, and sorry if it's a basic one. When interpreting various spec documents is the qualifier 'should' always taken to indicate that something is optional? Two cases in point:

Accepted meaning of 'should' in spec documents

Hi, Just a quick clarification question, and sorry if it's a basic one. When interpreting various spec documents is the qualifier 'should' always taken to indicate that something is optional? Two cases in point: Bug 41718 was marked as an enhancement request with the explanation of "should =

svn commit: r512845 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: BUILDING netscape/README

Author: jim Date: Wed Feb 28 09:06:37 2007 New Revision: 512845 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=512845 Log: More nsapi plugin build help Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/BUILDING tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/netscape/README Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk

Re: org.apache.catalina.util.InstanceSupport.fireInstanceEvent

Dominik Pospisil wrote: Dominik Pospisil wrote: So I am thinking if this could not be the problem. Is is necessary to be this implementation synchronized? Given the implementation, you are not supposed to be using instance listeners at this time except for debugging purposes. Since

Re: reload on demand

Kent Tong wrote: Hi, I've recently posted a request for a reload-on-demand feature (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.tomcat.user/144699). Wondering if you guys (Tomcat developers) think it's useful, nice to have or just total crap? If it's not crap, I may try to find some time to s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41723] - POST data is not getting through to CGI-Script

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: org.apache.catalina.util.InstanceSupport.fireInstanceEvent

> Dominik Pospisil wrote: > > So I am thinking if this could not be the problem. Is is necessary to be > > this implementation synchronized? > > Given the implementation, you are not supposed to be using instance > listeners at this time except for debugging purposes. > > Since InstanceSupport is a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41723] New: - POST data is not getting through to CGI-Script

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

reload on demand

Hi, I've recently posted a request for a reload-on-demand feature (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.tomcat.user/144699). Wondering if you guys (Tomcat developers) think it's useful, nice to have or just total crap? If it's not crap, I may try to find some time to see if I am capable

svn commit: r512694 - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/ xdocs/ xdocs/stylesheets/

Author: remm Date: Wed Feb 28 02:37:45 2007 New Revision: 512694 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=512694 Log: - Add small migration guide. Added: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/migration.html (with props) tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/migration.xml (with props) Modified: tomcat/si

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41722] New: - role-link tag in web.xml can not be omitted.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu