DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41225] - exception UnsatifiedLinkError.

2006-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: mod_jk, default value of retries is still 3?

2006-12-21 Thread Takayuki Kaneko
Hi, Rainer I saw "three" in the description column. :) Regards, -Takayuki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 6.0 status

2006-12-21 Thread Martin Dubuc
+1 to declare 6.0.6 beta. I am quite satisfied with its stability. Martin On 12/21/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it could be a beta if n

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38898] - Tomcat service fails without error message

2006-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41227] New: - When the jasper compiler fails to compile a JSP, it doesn't print the name of the file

2006-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 6.0 status

2006-12-21 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 11:29 -0500, Yoav Shapira wrote: > > Four, we've only had alpha releases, and I assume the uptake on these > has been fairly low. Once we label a release as beta or, even more, > stable, we'll get a bunch more testers, and then we'll see if/how much > complaining there is abo

Re: 6.0 status

2006-12-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it could be a beta if no further problems are found), as long as releasing a new 6.0.7 alpha build. Cluster: It seems some work

Re: 6.0 status

2006-12-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, On 12/21/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it could be a beta if no further problems are found), as long as releasing a n

Re: 6.0 status

2006-12-21 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 17:19 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Admin: I didn't see anyone yet complain or ask for the admin webapp in > 6.0, so I suppose it's really ok to not have it For Tomcat 5.5.20, since the admin webapp is not part of the binary download (don't recall it being in there). We a

Re: 6.0 status

2006-12-21 Thread Henri Gomez
One, the management app market has matured since the admin webapp was originally developed: there are now a bunch of capable admin apps that support Tomcat: the lambda probe, hyperic, jmanage, mc4j, BEA's thing, etc. lambda probe is really great... -

Re: 6.0 status

2006-12-21 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, On 12/21/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it could be a beta if no further problems are found), as long as releasing a new 6.0.7 alpha build.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40909] - High CPU Usage When Using mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp connectors

2006-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

6.0 status

2006-12-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it could be a beta if no further problems are found), as long as releasing a new 6.0.7 alpha build. Cluster: It seems some work remains on the cluster

Re: Tomcat-6.0.6 - path attribute not honored in Context descriptor files.

2006-12-21 Thread Markus Schönhaber
boris wrote: > I know that it works according to the documentation but I can't > ignore the fact that I believe it's wrong. If you think the way Tomcat handles deployment is wrong, OK. But I don't think you convince the developers (I'm not one, BTW) to change their point of view by hijacking a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41213] - URLs with session ID in them no longer work

2006-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tomcat-6.0.6 - path attribute not honored in Context descriptor files.

2006-12-21 Thread boris
I know that it works according to the documentation but I can't ignore the fact that I believe it's wrong. If you look closer in the code of HostConfig.deployDescriptors() you note that others has missed the ability to set the context path and has hidden it in the filename which is neither portable

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41213] - URLs with session ID in them no longer work

2006-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Tomcat Connectors Status?

2006-12-21 Thread Fenlason, Josh
I got my question about mod_jk 1.2.20 answered. (Thanks Rainer.) Anyone know what the status of the native apr connector is in Tomcat 5.5? Thanks in advance. , Josh. > -Original Message- > From: Fenlason, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:15 PM > To: d

Re: Tomcat-6.0.6 - path attribute not honored in Context descriptor files.

2006-12-21 Thread Markus Schönhaber
boris wrote: > The problem > is that the "path" attribute is ignored in the Context read from this > directory. Only Contexts defined in the server.xml file honors the > path attribute. That's not a problem. It's exactly the way it's meant to be: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/co

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41225] New: - exception UnsatifiedLinkError.

2006-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41213] - URLs with session ID in them no longer work

2006-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Tomcat-6.0.6 - path attribute not honored in Context descriptor files.

2006-12-21 Thread boris
Problem: The "path" attribute in the Context descriptor file no used in TC 5.5 and 6.0. Background: In an application deployment you whish to be able to install and upgrade both tomcat and your WARS individually. In TC 4.1 this was easily done by dropping a Context descriptor file in the webapps d