DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37869] - Cannot obtain client certificate with SSL / client certificate authentication using APR components

2006-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2006/12/17]

2006-12-17 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Watchdog [2006/12/17]

2006-12-17 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2006/12/17]

2006-12-17 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2006/12/17]

2006-12-17 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Serious mod_jk performance issue

2006-12-17 Thread Henri Gomez
All in all I think that throughput for huge files is very good in both cases. I would expect, that most often it would be much more intersting to inspect scalability and system load (cpu/memory) for massive concurrency. When serving large files, downloads will run a long time because most often th

Re: Serious mod_jk performance issue

2006-12-17 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Jess, I did some simple tests and was not able to reproduce your performance observations. Nevertheless I could observe a couple of strange things, but I doubt, if they are relevant to most use cases. First my setup: Apache 2.0.59 worker with mod_jk 1.2.20 and Tomcat 5.5.17 with normal (non-a

Re: Draft Board report for December 2006

2006-12-17 Thread Rainer Jung
OK with me, thanks for doing this. Yoav Shapira schrieb: > Hi, > Here's an updated draft with PMC feedback. Take a day or two to > comment if you'd like: I'm aiming to send this in to the Board by 5pm > EST tomorrow (Monday). > > Yoav > > --- Begin Draft --- > > Apache Tomcat Board Report, Dec

svn commit: r487990 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_util.c

2006-12-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Dec 17 06:52:54 2006 New Revision: 487990 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=487990 Log: Use correct windows line endings for log file on WIN32 platform. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_util.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/nati

Re: Draft Board report for December 2006

2006-12-17 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Here's an updated draft with PMC feedback. Take a day or two to comment if you'd like: I'm aiming to send this in to the Board by 5pm EST tomorrow (Monday). Yoav --- Begin Draft --- Apache Tomcat Board Report, December 2006 --

svn commit: r487982 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c

2006-12-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Dec 17 05:54:10 2006 New Revision: 487982 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=487982 Log: Fix missing format char for worker name in log message. This one was missing since we introduced that message. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp

svn commit: r487981 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk: native/ native/common/ native/iis/ native/iis/installer/ xdocs/miscellaneous/

2006-12-17 Thread rjung
Author: rjung Date: Sun Dec 17 05:53:14 2006 New Revision: 487981 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=487981 Log: Start dev cycle for version 1.2.21: increase version number etc. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/STATUS.txt tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34868] - allow to register a trust store for a session that becomes effective before CLIENT-CERT auth is executed on requests

2006-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu