DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40996] New: - Tomcat Connectors 1.2.19 sticky sessions not sticky

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.20

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Yoav Shapira wrote: > > What did we miss? Was it a formal announcement to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > about 6.0.1 stability? Was it formally marking the 6.0.1 time/date > poll as a voting thread and posting its results? What you are missing is pretty straightforward. It's that you can't have a release

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Hi, I understand what Bill is saying. Let's talk specifics to see what we missed. We had a poll on this public mailing list to decide on a time and date to cut 6.0.1. We agreed on a time/date, and cut the release then. We announced here that the release was available and said we'd have a stabi

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Mladen Turk wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF >> policy... >> I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your >> downloads page. >> > > Nothing got broken. Actually it did, because I've followed the list for

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Remy Maucherat wrote: 6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta I like it :) Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39589] - $CATALINA_BASE/shared/lib and $CATALINA_BASE/shared/classes libraries not found in specific deployments

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Jasper: Using a non-File based environment

Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi, I am new to this list, so let me quickly introduce myself: I am Felix Meschberger and am working on a Web Content Management Application running on a Java Content Repository (Apache Jackrabbit) provding amongst other things dynamic compilation of JSP scripts. I am al

Re: svn commit: r452464 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/scripts/build/instdso.sh

Hello Jean-Frederic, there is a problem with the instdso.sh you checked in. It removes a couple of files at the end, including the mod_jk.la file. When we run "make install" afterwards, apxs again tries to run instdso.sh from it's apache installation and complains about the missing mod_jk.la.

Jasper: Using a non-File based environment

Hi, I am new to this list, so let me quickly introduce myself: I am Felix Meschberger and am working on a Web Content Management Application running on a Java Content Repository (Apache Jackrabbit) provding amongst other things dynamic compilation of JSP scripts. I am also a committer to the Jack

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40993] - add session_cookie to lb worker to support customed SESSION_IDENTIFIER

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40993] New: - add session_cookie to lb worker to support customed SESSION_IDENTIFIER

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40668] - MailSessionFactory is missing in Tomcat 5.5.20

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Nothing got broken. Tomcat is probably one of the latest remaining projects where the developers and PMC st

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. +1 -- Mladen - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

I could swear we had agreed before the release candidate was posted to call the first couple of 6.0 builds alpha... +1 for 6.0.1 as alpha. Yoav On 11/17/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

+1 -- 6.0.2 is beta, Am 17.11.2006 um 10:46 schrieb William A. Rowe, Jr.: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp (in module tomcat-tc6) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp (in module tomcat-tc6) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project tomcat-tc6-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp (in module jakarta-tomcat-5) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp (in module jakarta-tomcat-5) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

+1 2006/11/17, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for 'alpha'? Remy Maucher

Re: Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha

Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy... I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page. Please remedy this - even if it's a matter of 3 +1's for 'alpha'? Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > Tomcat 6.0.1 alpha is now available for