Jk 1.2.18 binary for win32 won't load

Haven't been able to determine why, but the win32 binary for JK 1.2.18 doesn't work with IIS5. JK 1.2.15 works without a hitch. There have been a number of similar reports on the users list. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40315] New: - WebAppClassLoader behavior when getting resource "/"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39404] - Tomcat 5.0.28 service fails without error message on Windows2003

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

SSL JNDIRealm implementation

Hi, It seems Tomcat does not support SSL through the JNDIRealm that is implemented with Catalina. A while ago, I was looking for a solution to this, and stumbled across the Cougaar security work. They seem to have provided a SecureJNDIRealm implementation that is compatible with the existin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39404] - Tomcat 5.0.28 service fails without error message on Windows2003

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: possible mod_jk "feature"

On Aug 24, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: I'd like to propose that I commit the patch, and then we add in the additional awareness of keepalives from the TCP as well as AJP PoVs. Sound OK? Sure. Think Rainer already committed your patch. yeah, I see... :) teach

Re: possible mod_jk "feature"

Jim Jagielski wrote: On Aug 24, 2006, at 4:12 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Mladen Turk schrieb: The patch the Jim provided, gives us the functionality of turning off the keep alive from the "clients" (httpd in this case) perspective. I do not

Re: possible mod_jk "feature"

Jim Jagielski wrote: I'd like to propose that I commit the patch, and then we add in the additional awareness of keepalives from the TCP as well as AJP PoVs. Sound OK? Sure. Think Rainer already committed your patch. -- Mladen. -

Re: possible mod_jk "feature"

On Aug 24, 2006, at 4:12 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Mladen Turk schrieb: The patch the Jim provided, gives us the functionality of turning off the keep alive from the "clients" (httpd in this case) perspective. I do not agree, although its

svn commit: r434345 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c common/jk_ajp_common.c common/jk_global.h common/jk_service.h

Author: rjung Date: Thu Aug 24 02:02:09 2006 New Revision: 434345 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=434345&view=rev Log: Workaround patch from Jim Jagielski to disable persistent connections in case of silent connection drops by firewalls. Stiil needs documentation with a couple of disclaimers

Re: possible mod_jk "feature"

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Mladen Turk schrieb: The patch the Jim provided, gives us the functionality of turning off the keep alive from the "clients" (httpd in this case) perspective. I do not agree, although its a hack and easy fix for the problem itself.