DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37262] - JDBC datasources are never released

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29497] - Connection pool, redeployment

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Push a principal object to Servlet ThreadLocal context

Hi All, I created a Realm implementation which authenticates username/password with credential stored in database. After authentication, I get a Principal object and I need to push this object to a ThreadLocal object so that any object run in Servlet can get the principal to do further authorizat

Re: FW: PermGen overflow

Hello Nikita, I only recently joined this list so I might have missed your first message (actually I subscribed that same day). I think what you wrote should help. If you are going to try it out, please let us know the result. Other than that, all I can think of to decrease heap space is to t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40147] - HTTP Status 404 - /jsp-examples/

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: FW: PermGen overflow

Nikita Belov wrote: > Why are you ignoring me? Am I state my question so incomprehensible or > is my English so bad? http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/tomcatuser.html#why - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional co

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40147] New: - HTTP Status 404 - /jsp-examples/

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30762] - destroy method in servlet called before contextDestroyed method in ServletContextListener class.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

problem with apache vhosts + tomcat

Hi all. I have a problem I dont seem to understand. I have two servers, with identical web.xmls, server.xmls, catalina policies, apache conf files, and mod_webapp apache modules. On one server domain.com and www.domain.com both resolve to the host container for domain.com. On the other, www.doma

Re: [Fwd: Re: svn commit: r426711 - in /apr/apr-util/trunk: include/apr_uri.h uri/apr_uri.c]

Jean-frederic Clere wrote: > > What I want to do is just to register port 8009 for AJP protocol. Not to > register the whole protocol ;-) If you followed the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED], the point was raised that it's very difficult to get your registration accepted when your port selection alre

Re: [Fwd: Re: svn commit: r426711 - in /apr/apr-util/trunk: include/apr_uri.h uri/apr_uri.c]

+1, cool. peter Am 31.07.2006 um 15:23 schrieb Remy Maucherat: Jean-frederic Clere wrote: What I want to do is just to register port 8009 for AJP protocol. Not to register the whole protocol ;-) That's what I said: I can't see any problem with attempting this registration. Rémy ---

Re: [Fwd: Re: svn commit: r426711 - in /apr/apr-util/trunk: include/apr_uri.h uri/apr_uri.c]

Jean-frederic Clere wrote: What I want to do is just to register port 8009 for AJP protocol. Not to register the whole protocol ;-) That's what I said: I can't see any problem with attempting this registration. Rémy - To un

Re: [Fwd: Re: svn commit: r426711 - in /apr/apr-util/trunk: include/apr_uri.h uri/apr_uri.c]

Remy Maucherat wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Hi, Does it make sense we register the AJP port to IANA? No. It has numerous limitations that makes it almost unusable in anything but webserver->servlet-engine communication. And even that is limited by the 8K message.

Re: [Fwd: Re: svn commit: r426711 - in /apr/apr-util/trunk: include/apr_uri.h uri/apr_uri.c]

Mladen Turk wrote: Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Hi, Does it make sense we register the AJP port to IANA? No. It has numerous limitations that makes it almost unusable in anything but webserver->servlet-engine communication. And even that is limited by the 8K message. We should persuade a next

Re: [Fwd: Re: svn commit: r426711 - in /apr/apr-util/trunk: include/apr_uri.h uri/apr_uri.c]

Jean-frederic Clere wrote: Hi, Does it make sense we register the AJP port to IANA? No. It has numerous limitations that makes it almost unusable in anything but webserver->servlet-engine communication. And even that is limited by the 8K message. We should persuade a next generation binary ht

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40107] - JK should handle EAGAIN in jk_is_socket_connected()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Fwd: Re: svn commit: r426711 - in /apr/apr-util/trunk: include/apr_uri.h uri/apr_uri.c]

Hi, Does it make sense we register the AJP port to IANA? Cheers Jean-Frederic --- Begin Message --- On 7/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Author: jfclere Date: Fri Jul 28 16:54:20 2006 New Revision: 426711 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=426711&view=rev Log: Add AJP

FW: PermGen overflow

Why are you ignoring me? Am I state my question so incomprehensible or is my English so bad? -- Nikita -Original Message- From: Nikita Belov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:58 PM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: PermGen overflow Hello all, I am sorry, I