DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37588] - Creating JNDIRealm through JMX is not correct.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37588] New: - Creating JNDIRealm through JMX is not correct.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Create JNDIRealm in admin webapp is not correct.

Hi, gents, Regarding this mail, http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=113035775420898&w=2 I have tested both tomcat admin app and MBean createJNDIRealm can't create a realm successfully with Tomcat5.5.12. I have checked some code and found a bug in creating an JNDIRealm. The signature o

RE: svn commit: r348087 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/AuthenticatorBase.java

Sorry, I'm just being dump here. My comment should be for r348091 instead of this r348087. Shamefully yours Nam -- Random humorous quote: Monday is an awful way to spend 1/7th of your life. -Original Message- From: Nam T. Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 200

svn commit: r348091 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm/RealmBase.java

Author: billbarker Date: Mon Nov 21 21:18:05 2005 New Revision: 348091 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=348091&view=rev Log: Fix for a couple of (mostly silly) edge-cases in testing auth. If any security-contraint doesn't have a auth-constraint, then we pass. Otherwise, if any security-cons

RE: svn commit: r348087 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/AuthenticatorBase.java

This is in accordance with both Servlet and JACC specs. JACC spec gives higher precedence to unchecked permissions than checked permissions. Complaints should go to both groups :D Cheers Nam -- Random humorous quote: Usually I try to take it one day at a time, but lately several have attacked

svn commit: r348087 - /tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/AuthenticatorBase.java

Author: billbarker Date: Mon Nov 21 21:06:40 2005 New Revision: 348087 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=348087&view=rev Log: The rule is that you authenticate if *all* security-constraints include an auth-constraint. If you have a problem with this, take it up with the Servlet expert-grou

Re: Bug in Combining Authorization Constraints

This should be fixed in the SVN trunk, and will appear in 5.5.13. Thanks for reporting this! - Original Message - From: "Nam T. Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:21 AM Subject: Bug in Combining Authorization Constraints Hi I have two elements in my

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37132] - Digest authentication does not work if the username or URI contain a comma

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: How to turn the Digester off?

anita kulshreshtha wrote: Since there was no reply, I am assuming that turning off the digester is not straightforward. Could someone please point me to the relevant code? Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am using tomcat as an embedded engine and the

Re: [VOTE] APR or NIO ?

On 11/21/05, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > > I hope you are not serious... Sorry if I sounded too critical of the > > APR code - it is a great > > piece of code in many ways, I just didn't like some (probably minor) things. > > Ok, but it helped make me reali

Re: How to turn the Digester off?

Since there was no reply, I am assuming that turning off the digester is not straightforward. Could someone please point me to the relevant code? Thanks Anita --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using tomcat as an embedded engine and the > web.xml is parsed once by

svn commit: r345898 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11AprProcessor.java

Author: remm Date: Mon Nov 21 04:46:09 2005 New Revision: 345898 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345898&view=rev Log: - Either I am completely mistaken, or the type used was wrong. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11AprProcessor.java Modi

Re: [VOTE] APR or NIO ?

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:55:08AM +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > >Well why so much noise about NIO/APR ? > > Because I don't want to have to support 20 different connector > technologies (you can call it a business requirement). So one has to be > labelled as "experimental"

Re: [VOTE] APR or NIO ?

Henri Gomez wrote: Well why so much noise about NIO/APR ? Because I don't want to have to support 20 different connector technologies (you can call it a business requirement). So one has to be labelled as "experimental" or something. Similarly, the connector options right now are (for me) a

Re: [VOTE] APR or NIO ?

Costin Manolache wrote: I hope you are not serious... Sorry if I sounded too critical of the APR code - it is a great piece of code in many ways, I just didn't like some (probably minor) things. Ok, but it helped make me realize I should maintain my own tree anyway, since my plans are a bit op

Re: [VOTE] APR or NIO ?

Well why so much noise about NIO/APR ? If some want to experiment APR or NIO, why can't they do their works on some sort of incubations projets and when stable enough give us benchmarks results. Benchmarks/tesings should give us information on : stability, speed, memory usage, IO usage and of co

RE: Bug in Combining Authorization Constraints

Replying to my own post. Sorry, the attachment mysteriously disappeared. Anyway, the important part is here Index 1 /index.jsp * Index 2 /index.jsp Cheers Nam

Bug in Combining Authorization Constraints

Hi I have two elements in my deployment descriptor. One has auth-constraint *, and the other does not have any . They both have a same . By SRV.12.8.1 Combining Constraints: A security constraints that does not contain an authorization constraint shall combine with authorization constraints t