DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35916] - Session listeners not called on cluster server restart

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cluster startContext() SimpleTcpCluster

Hey, manager is started after some other things are active. s. Standardcontext.start() L.4079 WebApp Listener and Filters starts after manager. The NamingContextListener (JNDI) starts before Manager is started. Ok, what can we do? Peter local-underground schrieb: Peter, Thanks for respon

Re: Cluster startContext() SimpleTcpCluster

Peter, Thanks for response. I did not implement my own replication, I only looked at the code to see if my Context was started before the Cluster performed replication. Let me try and clarify by asking this question: Does the Context start (meaning my servlet is started) before the Delta manag

Re: Fwd: FarmWarDeployer

Hey! At development with Tomcat 5.5.9 and 5.5.12 I have successful used FarmWarDeployer, but - you lost your complete session information at your cluster - Use it without waitForAck or with a great ackTimeout ( > deployment time) - only one config can have watchEnabled="true"

Re: svn commit: r329053 - in /tomcat/sandbox/java: ./ org/ org/apache/ org/apache/commons/ org/apache/commons/logging/

On 10/28/05, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: costin > > Date: Thu Oct 27 19:55:08 2005 > > New Revision: 329053 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=329053&view=rev > > Log: > > Implementation of commons-logging that doesn't use any discove

Fwd: FarmWarDeployer

Trying the dev list... -- Forwarded message -- From: Brian O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Oct 26, 2005 1:37 PM Subject: FarmWarDeployer To: users@tomcat.apache.org Hello, Is FarmWarDeployer ready for use? I have played around with it a little but have been unsuccessful so far

Re: svn commit: r329081 [1/2] - /tomcat/sandbox/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/

I'll try. My biggest problem is to do this without breaking too much backward compat. After we add BB - the rest might be easier. Costin On 10/28/05, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: costin > > Date: Thu Oct 27 21:11:42 2005 > > New Revision: 32908

Re: svn commit: r329081 [1/2] - /tomcat/sandbox/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: costin Date: Thu Oct 27 21:11:42 2005 New Revision: 329081 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=329081&view=rev Log: Import the current version of o.a.t.util.buf, for refactoring. I'm trying to use nio. Added: tomcat/sandbox/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf

Re: svn commit: r329053 - in /tomcat/sandbox/java: ./ org/ org/apache/ org/apache/commons/ org/apache/commons/logging/

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: costin Date: Thu Oct 27 19:55:08 2005 New Revision: 329053 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=329053&view=rev Log: Implementation of commons-logging that doesn't use any discovery or tricks, just plain java.util.logging. There is a trick actually - at startu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37269] - sticky session doesn't seem to work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu