Re: [dev] writing a suckless sed

2014-09-23 Thread M Farkas-Dyck
On 22/09/2014, Evan Gates wrote: > One thing I'm not clear on, in your opinion does suckless software use > fixed or dynamic sized buffers/stacks? i.e. should it support > arbitrarily long lines? depth of nested blocks? number of write files? > I've seen some of both in software that seems suckles

Re: [dev] writing a suckless sed

2014-09-23 Thread Dimitris Papastamos
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:40:27AM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > There's currently no plan to implement a regex-engine, because we don't > suffer from NiH. Really? :P

Re: [dev] writing a suckless sed

2014-09-22 Thread FRIGN
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:01:28 -0700 Evan Gates wrote: Hey Evan > I somewhat recently wrote my own sed[0]. It was mostly for fun and to > check sed scripts for strict POSIX compliance. Seeing as it was a > first attempt and enforced some horrendous POSIX requirements my sed > sucks more. A lot mor

[dev] writing a suckless sed

2014-09-22 Thread Evan Gates
Hello suckless, I somewhat recently wrote my own sed[0]. It was mostly for fun and to check sed scripts for strict POSIX compliance. Seeing as it was a first attempt and enforced some horrendous POSIX requirements my sed sucks more. A lot more. Moving forward I plan on rewriting it now that I hav