m...@datameer.com wrote:
> yea, I should do it. The thing is I didn't run into a crash with firefox
> or vimb.
just for correctness.
i was running into the same thing with vimb (they
catch the error and do not crash at all)
so it is obvisuosly a webkit issue.
thx
marko
Страхиња Радић wrote:
> On 22/01/13 11:52, m...@datameer.com wrote:
> Why don't you just try it and find out?
I did it and i'm getting the same issue.
> If you are asking me about my personal experience, I always compile surf from
> source.
yes, i was more interrested into personal experience.
On 22/01/13 11:52, m...@datameer.com wrote:
> Regarding the note on the website `Compile your own webkit or expect
> hell`...
> Is it better or more stable to compile webkit as well?
Why don't you just try it and find out?
If you are asking me about my personal experience, I always compile surf f
m...@datameer.com wrote:
> Does that mean I have to compile surf incl all dependencies with
> https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages?
>
> Or do you have any other hint for me?
Страхиња did show you the way : config.h is the user configuration
file, distributions might also want packages with
Страхиња Радић wrote:
> Compiling from source is the intended way to use suckless software.
>
> Suckless software is configured by editing config.h, rather than by using
> configuration files.
Yes, i'm used to compile my suckless software setup (when i have patches).
In this case I hadn't patche
On 22/01/12 04:02, m...@datameer.com wrote:
> Does that mean I have to compile surf incl all dependencies with
> https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages?
Compiling from source is the intended way to use suckless software.
Suckless software is configured by editing config.h, rather than by usi
Hi,
I'm using voidlinux, dwm, st, dmenu.
I would like to start using surf as my daily web browser.
So I installed the binary verion from the package manager.
`surf-2.1_1` and `webkit2gtk-2.34.2_1`.
After some seconds or minutes of browsing the surf process terminates
with
```
web process terminat
> Hi,
Hi Joachim,
> surf crashes with segmentation fault when opening http://dhl.de
> This only happens on 32 bit systems (Debian Jessie).
>
> I compiled the latest version from git with symbols and did a
> backtrace under gdb:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0xaa5c5a
I can reproduce bug on Debian. Just did a git clone
git://git.suckless.org/surf then make.
~> cat /etc/debian_version
8.7
~> uname -a
Linux t400 3.16.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1+deb8u1 (2017-02-22)
i686 GNU/Linux
~/a/surf> ./surf -p http://dhl.de
Vector smash protection is enabled.
java v
Hi,
surf crashes with segmentation fault when opening http://dhl.de
This only happens on 32 bit systems (Debian Jessie).
I compiled the latest version from git with symbols and did a backtrace
under gdb:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xaa5c5a00 in ?? ()
(gdb) backtrace
#
> $ G_DEBUG=fatal-criticals gdb ./surf
> (gdb) cont
> ...
> (gdb) bt
Backtrace from clicking anywhere on the window border of surf under dwm:
#0 0xb71ae968 in _gdk_windowing_got_event () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#1 0xb71cae47 in _gdk_events_queue () from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#2
$ G_DEBUG=fatal-criticals gdb ./surf
(gdb) cont
...
(gdb) bt
Evgeny Grablyk wrote:
I tried this on Arch linux x64, surf-hg. It did not segfault, but
produced these warnings on each border click:
(:31278): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_events: assertion
`GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed
(:31278
I tried this on Arch linux x64, surf-hg. It did not segfault, but
produced these warnings on each border click:
(:31278): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_events: assertion
`GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed
(:31278): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion
`G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
(:31
> That's a corner case ;)
An edge case surely.
Jon.
On 29 January 2010 08:00, Jonathan Slark wrote:
>
> I'm running surf under dwm. I accidently clicked it's border and *womph* it
> disapeared! I ran surf from a terminal so I could see any output and
> repeated the click, it did the same thing saying there was a segmentation
> fault.
>
> Other
can't reproduce on 32bit/64bit.
2010/1/29 pancake :
> That's a corner case ;)
>
> On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Slark
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm running surf under dwm. I accidently clicked it's border and *womph*
>> it disapeared! I ran surf from a terminal so I could see any output and
>> r
That's a corner case ;)
On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Slark
wrote:
I'm running surf under dwm. I accidently clicked it's border and
*womph* it disapeared! I ran surf from a terminal so I could see
any output and repeated the click, it did the same thing saying
there was a s
I'm running surf under dwm. I accidently clicked it's border and *womph* it
disapeared! I ran surf from a terminal so I could see any output and repeated
the click, it did the same thing saying there was a segmentation fault.
Other windows in dwm don't seem to have the same problem; if I clic
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 06:49:07PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/10/31 Lorenzo Bolla :
> > Hi all,
> > I've tried to compile the latest surf version with libwebkit-1.1.15.3-1 and
> > gtk-1.2.10-9.
> > Compilation went fine, but running surf from the command line gets me a
> > "Segmentation fa
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:31:58 +0100
cryptix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libwebkit-1.1.15.3-1 breaks surf (and i heard uzbl, too).
> try to get 1.1.15.2-1, which might be in /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ if
> you haven't cleaned after the update or just installed.
>
>
> no problem,
>
> C.
>
> On 31.10.2009, at
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Lorenzo Bolla wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've tried to compile the latest surf version with libwebkit-1.1.15.3-1 and
> gtk-1.2.10-9.
Try using gtk2. Webkit requires a very recent version of gtk2.
--
# Kurt H Maier
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 06:49:07PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> So I'm a bit puzzled it worked for me without any issues and other
> telling me they tracked it down into enchant's dbus behavior or
> something. Is this arch linux related I wonder?
As already said in a earlier thread, my arch has
2009/10/31 Anselm R Garbe :
> 2009/10/31 Lorenzo Bolla :
>> Hi all,
>> I've tried to compile the latest surf version with libwebkit-1.1.15.3-1 and
>> gtk-1.2.10-9.
>> Compilation went fine, but running surf from the command line gets me a
>> "Segmentation fault".
>> Any hints?
>> I'm running Arch L
2009/10/31 Lorenzo Bolla :
> Hi all,
> I've tried to compile the latest surf version with libwebkit-1.1.15.3-1 and
> gtk-1.2.10-9.
> Compilation went fine, but running surf from the command line gets me a
> "Segmentation fault".
> Any hints?
> I'm running Arch Linux 2.6.31-ARCH
I tried to reproduc
Hi,
libwebkit-1.1.15.3-1 breaks surf (and i heard uzbl, too).
try to get 1.1.15.2-1, which might be in /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ if you
haven't cleaned after the update or just installed.
no problem,
C.
On 31.10.2009, at 19:03, Lorenzo Bolla wrote:
Hi all,
I've tried to compile the latest
Hi all,
I've tried to compile the latest surf version with libwebkit-1.1.15.3-1 and
gtk-1.2.10-9.
Compilation went fine, but running surf from the command line gets me a
"Segmentation fault".
Any hints?
I'm running Arch Linux 2.6.31-ARCH
Thanks,
L.
26 matches
Mail list logo
