Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> what would a "javascript download" be?
I confess to not having looked in depth at all the nasty obfuscated
ways javascript heavy sites 'protect' downloads. But Carlos in the
original version of the patch refers to "javascript that generates
POST requests".
I thing the
Quoth Nick:
> In other surf news, I created a page on the wiki
> http://surf.suckless.org/failing_sites - if anyone finds something
> that doesn't work in surf, please detail it there (or on the mailing
> list). While surf is very far from perfect, it's the most reasonable
> way of using today's
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:51:10PM +0100, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> > Nick writes:
> >
> > > Howdy,
> > >
> > > I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in
> > > July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather
> > > than relying on e.g. wg
On 2011-09-28 14:51, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> > Nick writes:
> > Huh? I have not had trouble using wget for this.
> Can anyone else confirm / deny this?
Not for those sites, however I did see enough fails to add the same to
https://github.com/patrickhaller/surf-ph
Patrick
Nick writes:
> In other surf news, I created a page on the wiki
> http://surf.suckless.org/failing_sites - if anyone finds something
> that doesn't work in surf, please detail it there (or on the mailing
> list). While surf is very far from perfect, it's the most reasonable
> way of using toda
Nick writes:
> Quoth Troels Henriksen:
>> Nick writes:
>>
>> > Howdy,
>> >
>> > I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in
>> > July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather
>> > than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it
>>
Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> Nick writes:
>
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in
> > July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather
> > than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it
> > isn't, as it's needed f
Nick writes:
> Howdy,
>
> I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in
> July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather
> than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it
> isn't, as it's needed for horrible javascript sorts of download
Howdy,
I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in
July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather
than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it
isn't, as it's needed for horrible javascript sorts of downloads,
such as from rapidshar
Hi,
this patch implements a more general approach to http downloading that
doesn't depend on external tools and can cope with resources that are
not easily URI-referenced (for example, for sites like rapidshare with
evil javascript that generates POST requests).
The patch just uses the webkit dow
10 matches
Mail list logo
