On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:35:59PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> According to sysprof st is spending on my system most of the time in de‐
> coding utf8. But that’s not what’s hogging the system when running cma‐
> trix(1). The Intel DRM driver is too slow, as it seems. I have the same
> hoggi
Greetings.
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 20:35:59 +0200 Toaster Toaster
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Toaster Toaster
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> >> Greetings.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:34:55 +0200 Toaster Toaster
> >> wrot
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero schrieb am 05.04.2014 08:22:
> > Just checked, the information already got updated in
> >http://invisible-island.net/datafiles/current/terminfo.src.gz:
>
> Uhmmm, too fast!. I was thinking change the behaviour of backspace,
> that in this moment is generating delete ins
> Just checked, the information already got updated in
> http://invisible-island.net/datafiles/current/terminfo.src.gz:
Uhmmm, too fast!. I was thinking change the behaviour of backspace,
that in this moment is generating delete instead of backspace, but
if I change it, then you will find some sys
Greetings.
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 16:49:45 +0200 Toaster Toaster
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Toaster Toaster
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> >> Greetings.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:34:55 +0200 Toaster Toaster
> >> wrot
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Toaster Toaster wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>> Greetings.
>>
>> On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:34:55 +0200 Toaster Toaster
>> wrote:
>>> Updated to git, still freezes. Spamming "ls" also makes Xorg consume
>>> crazy a
Heyho,
Silvan Jegen wrote:
> I think the issue is reproducible using the extremely-useful 'cmatrix'
> program. You get a lot of stutter and 100%+ X CPU usage when running
> it with st while X stays at around 15% CPU usage with urxvt running
> cmatrix buttery-smoothly.
I can't reproduce. It's work
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Toaster Toaster wrote:
> [..]
> Updated to git, still freezes. Spamming "ls" also makes Xorg consume
> crazy amounts of CPU. Do you think they are related? Something to do
> with how St redraws the screen?
I think the issue is reproducible using the extremely-usefu
Nils R schrieb am 04.04.2014 09:03:
> Roberto E. Vargas Caballero schrieb am 03.04.2014 17:40:
> > > >http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1401/19619.html
> > > > I'm having the same problem as the person in this link.
> > > >
> > > > I'm using dwm 6.0 and st 0.4.1
> > >
> > > You can’t be supported when
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero schrieb am 03.04.2014 17:40:
> > >http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1401/19619.html
> > > I'm having the same problem as the person in this link.
> > >
> > > I'm using dwm 6.0 and st 0.4.1
> >
> > You can’t be supported when not using the git version. Version numbers
> > are
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:34:55 +0200 Toaster Toaster
> wrote:
>> Updated to git, still freezes. Spamming "ls" also makes Xorg consume
>> crazy amounts of CPU. Do you think they are related? Something to do
>>
Greetings.
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:34:55 +0200 Toaster Toaster
wrote:
> Updated to git, still freezes. Spamming "ls" also makes Xorg consume
> crazy amounts of CPU. Do you think they are related? Something to do
> with how St redraws the screen?
You are the programmer. Please find it out. Debugg
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:40:23 +0200 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
> wrote:
>> > > http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1401/19619.html
>> > > I'm having the same problem as the person in this link.
>> > >
>> > > I'm
Greetings.
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:40:23 +0200 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> > > http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1401/19619.html
> > > I'm having the same problem as the person in this link.
> > >
> > > I'm using dwm 6.0 and st 0.4.1
> >
> > You can’t be supported when not using the gi
> > http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1401/19619.html
> > I'm having the same problem as the person in this link.
> >
> > I'm using dwm 6.0 and st 0.4.1
>
> You can’t be supported when not using the git version. Version numbers
> are there to irritate people.
Yeah I agree with you Christoph, but I
Greetings.
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:19:35 +0200 Toaster Toaster
wrote:
> http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1401/19619.html
> I'm having the same problem as the person in this link.
>
> I'm using dwm 6.0 and st 0.4.1
You can’t be supported when not using the git version. Version numbers
are there t
http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1401/19619.html
I'm having the same problem as the person in this link.
I'm using dwm 6.0 and st 0.4.1
17 matches
Mail list logo
