> If the program prints a expanation message and fails if it has read
> permission, then I'd agree with you.
>
Maybe just add chmod inside makefile's install rule?
[2009-12-28 22:18] Jessta
> 2009/12/20 markus schnalke :
> > [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
> >>
> >> I have done two patches for slock.
> >>
> >> The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user
> >> defined password.
> >
> > The password should probably not be a clear text string ins
2009/12/20 markus schnalke :
> [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
>>
>> I have done two patches for slock.
>>
>> The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user
>> defined password.
>
> The password should probably not be a clear text string inside the
> binary file, as one can easily read
Hi,
* Moritz Wilhelmy [2009-12-20 16:16]:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:29:48PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > [2009-12-20 12:03] Moritz Wilhelmy
> > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe we could give slock a system account to check the pass
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:29:48PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-12-20 12:03] Moritz Wilhelmy
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe we could give slock a system account to check the password
> > > against. Thus it must not to be the own ac
Hi.
2009-12-20 12:50, Antoni Grzymala :
> Moritz Wilhelmy dixit (2009-12-20, 12:03):
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > > [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
> > >
> > > The password should probably not be a clear text string inside the
> > > binary file, as one can
Moritz Wilhelmy dixit (2009-12-20, 12:03):
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> > [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
> > >
> > > I have done two patches for slock.
> > >
> > > The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user
> > > defined password.
> >
>
[2009-12-20 12:03] Moritz Wilhelmy
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we could give slock a system account to check the password
> > against. Thus it must not to be the own account, but can be a special
> > slock system user, which exists just for th
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:53:02AM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
> >
> > I have done two patches for slock.
> >
> > The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user
> > defined password.
>
> The password should probably not be a clear text string insi
[2009-12-19 21:37] pancake
>
> I have done two patches for slock.
>
> The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user
> defined password.
The password should probably not be a clear text string inside the
binary file, as one can easily read it with `strings slock'.
Is there a s
I have done two patches for slock.
The first simplifying the use of cpp and the other adding user defined password.
feel free to modify, test, commit or adapt those patches into mainstream if you
like.
--pancakediff -r 4d3769ac5d02 -r 69b727153929 slock.c
--- a/slock.c Thu Nov 26 12:53:26 2009
11 matches
Mail list logo
