Re: [dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-10 Thread Delete
On April 9, 2023 4:18:16 PM UTC, p...@mailbox.org wrote: >I had checked suckless.org on https://www.hardenize.com/, which report >`TLS, No support for STARTTLS`, but on checktls.com or testtls.com, >suckless.org is fine. > >On 09.04.23 13:47, Quentin Rameau wrote: >> >> No, suckless.org MX configu

Re: [dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-09 Thread pfx
I had checked suckless.org on https://www.hardenize.com/, which report `TLS, No support for STARTTLS`, but on checktls.com or testtls.com, suckless.org is fine. On 09.04.23 13:47, Quentin Rameau wrote: > > No, suckless.org MX configuration hasn't changed since last April (2022). > > Also, you ca

Re: [dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-09 Thread Quentin Rameau
Hi again, > > they are not enforcing tls, since mx.suckless.org supported tls before, > > according to their log, last time mx.suckless.org has tls on > > 2023-02-06, so they use the cache for the following email delivery, but > > out of a sudden, mx.suckless.org downgrade to non tls, so email fai

Re: [dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-09 Thread Delete
On April 9, 2023 11:47:33 AM UTC, Quentin Rameau wrote: >Hi PFX, > >> I am using the wrong words "not properly configured", what I mean is, >> since mx.suckless.org supported tls connection before, but right now >> mx.suckless.org downgraded to non tls, is this deliberately to be doing >> so? > >T

Re: [dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-09 Thread Quentin Rameau
Hi PFX, > I am using the wrong words "not properly configured", what I mean is, > since mx.suckless.org supported tls connection before, but right now > mx.suckless.org downgraded to non tls, is this deliberately to be doing > so? Thanks for the info! > they are not enforcing tls, since mx.suckl

Re: [dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-08 Thread pfx
they are not enforcing tls, since mx.suckless.org supported tls before, according to their log, last time mx.suckless.org has tls on 2023-02-06, so they use the cache for the following email delivery, but out of a sudden, mx.suckless.org downgrade to non tls, so email failed to deliver. so my ques

Re: [dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-08 Thread pfx
I am using the wrong words "not properly configured", what I mean is, since mx.suckless.org supported tls connection before, but right now mx.suckless.org downgraded to non tls, is this deliberately to be doing so? On 08.04.23 18:54, Quentin Rameau wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Hi PFX, > > > I

Re: [dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-08 Thread Quentin Rameau
> Hello everyone, Hi PFX, > I try to post to the list, but randomly failed with the error `TLS is > required, but was not offered by host mx.suckless.org` I report the > issue [1] to my email provider, it seems that mx.suckless.org somehow does > not properly configured. > > [1] > https://userf

Re: [dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-08 Thread Joseph Graham
Is your mail provider enforcing mandatory TLS? On Saturday, 8 April 2023 15:40:21 BST p...@mailbox.org wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I try to post to the list, but randomly failed with the error `TLS is > required, but was not offered by host mx.suckless.org` I report the > issue [1] to my email p

[dev] report mx.suckless.org tls issue

2023-04-08 Thread pfx
Hello everyone, I try to post to the list, but randomly failed with the error `TLS is required, but was not offered by host mx.suckless.org` I report the issue [1] to my email provider, it seems that mx.suckless.org somehow does not properly configured. [1] https://userforum.mailbox.org/topic/65