Re: [dev] no-confing-file orthodoxy

2015-06-05 Thread Martti Kühne
Follow-up: Configuration is code, and we know it. http://buff.ly/1JkenGl cheers! mar77i

Re: [dev] no-confing-file orthodoxy

2015-06-02 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
S. R. Gal said: > > What if I want some blue and orange dwm because the stock choice > > pale-ish blue and grey (in the 5.x days) is in humble my opinion ugly? > > I have a question about the no-config-file policy. > What if there are multiple user with different > color scheme taste? Should be s

Re: [dev] no-confing-file orthodoxy

2015-06-02 Thread 7heo
Yes. On June 2, 2015 12:55:54 PM CEST, FRIGN wrote: >On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:47:56 +0200 >"S. R. Gal" wrote: > >> I have a question about the no-config-file policy. >> What if there are multiple user with different >> color scheme taste? Should be separete binaries >> the only option? Or, is it

Re: [dev] no-confing-file orthodoxy

2015-06-02 Thread FRIGN
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:47:56 +0200 "S. R. Gal" wrote: > I have a question about the no-config-file policy. > What if there are multiple user with different > color scheme taste? Should be separete binaries > the only option? Or, is it so rare that your > girlfriends use dwm? Then manually inst

[dev] no-confing-file orthodoxy

2015-06-02 Thread S. R. Gal
> What if I want some blue and orange dwm because the stock choice > pale-ish blue and grey (in the 5.x days) is in humble my opinion ugly? I have a question about the no-config-file policy. What if there are multiple user with different color scheme taste? Should be separete binaries the only op