On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 08:26:36AM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> Have you tried to increase patch's fuzz factor with the --fuzz option in
> order to achieve the same result?
I messed tried messing with the fuzzing factor, but I had some patches
apply in wrong place. I am not certain beca
On Sun 24-07-2016 20:42 -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:21:42PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> > It's a difficult matter because patches interfere. I know of no way
> > to make multiple patches inclusive to each other, in many cases it
> > is not possible.
>
> Something I do with my
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Ben Woolley wrote:
> I think it is natural for related changes to be consolidated over time. Think
> of punctuated equilibrium.
>
> Maybe after it is clear that some patches just go well together, fitting a
> related niche, they could be consolidated to make main
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:21:42PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> It's a difficult matter because patches interfere. I know of no way to
> make multiple patches inclusive to each other, in many cases it is not
> possible.
Something I do with my patches to make them easier manually edit the
resulting diffs
I think Jan provided insight through experience. That is basically the opposite
of stupid.
> On Jul 24, 2016, at 2:09 PM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> perhaps you want too many stupid things.
>
I think it is natural for related changes to be consolidated over time. Think
of punctuated equilibrium.
Maybe after it is clear that some patches just go well together, fitting a
related niche, they could be consolidated to make maintenance easier.
> On Jul 24, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Jan Christo
perhaps you want too many stupid things.
Hi,
I also keep a patched version of dwm at github.com/jceb/dwm-patches that
stacks all the patches in order to smoothly apply them. This is also
how I develop my patch using quilt.
Unfortunately, it's extremely hard to port interwoven patches back to
mainline. I have some tooling at github.com
On 23.07.16 at 11:51am, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Britton Kerin wrote:
dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled
version of dwm might be useful instead:
You raise a go
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:54:36 -0800
Britton Kerin wrote:
Hey Britton,
> dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
> couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled
> version of dwm might be useful instead:
you really raise a valid point, fortunately
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Britton Kerin wrote:
> dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
> couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled
> version of dwm might be useful instead:
>
You raise a good point in my opinion: when someone upload
>Do *you* also need patches to be good?
Damn you suckless guys always know how to crack me up
2016-07-23 1:16 GMT+02:00 Quentin Carbonneaux :
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:54:36PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> dwm needs patches to be good [...]
>
> Do *you* also need patches to be good?
>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:54:36PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> dwm needs patches to be good [...]
Do *you* also need patches to be good?
Very nice! Keep up the good work,
regards,
Lukáš
2016-07-22 23:54 GMT+02:00 Britton Kerin :
> dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
> couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled
> version of dwm might be useful instead:
>
> brittonkerin.com/s
dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a pre-rolled
version of dwm might be useful instead:
brittonkerin.com/sdwm
It consists of the dwm head + the following fixed and merged patches:
=pertag=
because having
15 matches
Mail list logo
