On 11 August 2016 at 11:21, FRIGN wrote:
[..]
> I am sure suckless.org has a lot of street-cred in the OSS-scene. We
> could use this leverage to have a positive influence on a big
> distribution people actually use. In the long term, making OpenBSD
> better will benefit those who are scared of ma
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:03:13 +0200
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Hey Anselm,
> I have no problem with OpenBSD per se, but I do think that its scope
> is general (server) purpose and that the hardware support in the
> embedded non-network space doesn't sound too great to me. linux kernel
> + some dedica
On 11 August 2016 at 10:10, FRIGN wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:44:45 +0200
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> The stali plan has changed for me a bit during the last year. A couple
>> of months ago I tried to get stali self-bootstrappable based on just
>> src/. I have now given up on this idea for var
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:44:45 +0200
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Hey Anselm,
> The stali plan has changed for me a bit during the last year. A couple
> of months ago I tried to get stali self-bootstrappable based on just
> src/. I have now given up on this idea for various reasons:
> [...]
> Any help is
On 10 August 2016 at 08:47, Eli Cohen wrote:
> What's the plan for stali? I was under the impression it would be a
> "suckless distro" with dwm, surf, st... will X11 stuff be in a
> different repository?
The stali plan has changed for me a bit during the last year. A couple
of months ago I tried
Eli Cohen writes:
> I was wondering this. troff is for a lot more than man pages. i did
> notice some man files were included, but there's no way to read them.
> perhaps nroff would be more appropriate for stali, but i don't know of
> a good minimal version.
There's always mandoc. But anti-Unix la
I was wondering this. troff is for a lot more than man pages. i did
notice some man files were included, but there's no way to read them.
perhaps nroff would be more appropriate for stali, but i don't know of
a good minimal version. i could try writing one, but that would be a
lot more work than ju
On 10 August 2016 at 03:56, Eli Cohen wrote:
> I'm trying to get neatroff compiled in a stali fashion. I've run into
> a slight impasse regarding licensing. for typesetting, neatroff uses
> ghostscript fonts, which are gpl. (really my goal with all this is
> just to display man pages)
stali is o
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:56:35PM -0700, Eli Cohen wrote:
> I'm trying to get neatroff compiled in a stali fashion. I've run into
> a slight impasse regarding licensing. for typesetting, neatroff uses
> ghostscript fonts, which are gpl. (really my goal with all this is
> just to display man pages
I'm trying to get neatroff compiled in a stali fashion. I've run into
a slight impasse regarding licensing. for typesetting, neatroff uses
ghostscript fonts, which are gpl. (really my goal with all this is
just to display man pages)
10 matches
Mail list logo
