The word binocular comes from two Latin roots, bini for double, and oculus for
eye.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binocular_vision
-- antoniv
Martin Kühne wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> > however, "bioc" or "binoc" might be nice memorable names for the
>
> Why not carry the IRC back into the name and make it binoirc or even birco?
Heyho,
This is intended to be used with other chat protocols as well, so I wou
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:49:14 +0200
Martin Kühne wrote:
> Why not carry the IRC back into the name and make it binoirc or even
> birco?
Or maybe just birc. :D
--
FRIGN
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:40 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> however, "bioc" or "binoc" might be nice memorable names for the
Why not carry the IRC back into the name and make it binoirc or even birco?
cheers!
mar77i
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:09:30 +0200
Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hey Jan,
> I am programming on front-end and back-end tools for ii for several
> years now. For the back-end I use UCSPI[0] (Unix Client Server
> Program Interface). But there is no name for the front-end of tools
> like ii[1], ratox[2], sj
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, at 08:09, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am programming on front-end and back-end tools for ii for several
> years now. For the back-end I use UCSPI[0] (Unix Client Server Program
> Interface). But there is no name for the front-end of tools like ii[1],
> ratox[2], sj[3] or
I prefer to call it front-end
On 2016-09-27 15:09, Jan Klemkow wrote:
Hi,
I am programming on front-end and back-end tools for ii for several
years now. For the back-end I use UCSPI[0] (Unix Client Server Program
Interface). But there is no name for the front-end of tools like
ii[1],
ratox[
Hi,
I am programming on front-end and back-end tools for ii for several
years now. For the back-end I use UCSPI[0] (Unix Client Server Program
Interface). But there is no name for the front-end of tools like ii[1],
ratox[2], sj[3] or jj[4]. I used the term "ii-like" in my talk at the
slcon3, be
