On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:15 +0200, "Jakub Lach"
wrote:
> 15/09/2010 21:51 Uriel :
>
> > What issues? and why aren't they fixed?
> >
> > uriel
>
> Oh, I was expecting something more along
> the lines of "SDL is abomination and pile
> of putrid garbage anyway"..
Haha! It's certainly a git to
http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985
--
# Kurt H Maier
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Jakub Lach wrote:
> 15/09/2010 21:51 Uriel :
>
>> What issues? and why aren't they fixed?
>>
>> uriel
>
> Oh, I was expecting something more along
> the lines of "SDL is abomination and pile
> of putrid garbage anyway"..
>
> Basically I was thinking[1] that SDL a
15/09/2010 21:51 Uriel :
> What issues? and why aren't they fixed?
>
> uriel
Oh, I was expecting something more along
the lines of "SDL is abomination and pile
of putrid garbage anyway"..
Basically I was thinking[1] that SDL assumes
wm is re-parenting, which means that both cwm
and dwm ha
What issues? and why aren't they fixed?
uriel
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Jakub Lach wrote:
> 15/09/2010 11:51 Alexander Polakov :
>
>>Looks like he is reinventing OpenBSD's cwm.
>
> At least it's running SDL based apps* without
> problems. Last time I checked cwm had the same
> issues as
15/09/2010 11:51 Alexander Polakov :
>Looks like he is reinventing OpenBSD's cwm.
At least it's running SDL based apps* without
problems. Last time I checked cwm had the same
issues as dwm.
*Oh well, ok I admit it's chocolate-doom in my
case..
2010/9/14, Jakub Lach :
> Anybody tried mcwm?
>
> Looks somewhat promising.
>
Looks like he is reinventing OpenBSD's cwm.
--
Alexander Polakov | plhk.ru
Anybody tried mcwm?
Looks somewhat promising.
"The binary is 23 kilobytes stripped.
Typical resident memory use on FreeBSD
on x86 is ~1200 kiB and ~1400 kiB on x86-64.
It takes slightly half of that if compiled as a
static binary."
~3000 lines of code.
http://hack.org/mc/hacks/mcwm/
