Re: [dev] make framework for wmii

2009-05-31 Thread Uriel
Why not just use mk and be done with it? All the time wasted struggling with makefiles could be spent in more productive things, and it would help spread mk, which would be a very good thing. Peace uriel On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:24:36AM

Re: [dev] make framework for wmii

2009-05-25 Thread Kris Maglione
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:24:36AM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote: O.K. Sorry for poking half-baked one. Like you said, separating X11 dep is a way to go. BTW I also interested in p9p's AUTOLIB approach, so any technical reasons why you didn't embed/get library dependency into/from source files thems

Re: [dev] make framework for wmii

2009-05-25 Thread KIMURA Masaru
2009/5/26 Kris Maglione : > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:38:47PM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote: >> >> I'm now browsing wmii hg2467. >> a) default config.mk has X11PACKAGES=xft and INCX11=$$(pkg-config >> --cflags $(X11PACKAGES)) >> b) cmd/Makefile has redundant $$(pkg-config --libs $(X11PACKAGES)) w/ >>

Re: [dev] make framework for wmii

2009-05-25 Thread Kris Maglione
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:38:47PM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote: I'm now browsing wmii hg2467. a) default config.mk has X11PACKAGES=xft and INCX11=$$(pkg-config --cflags $(X11PACKAGES)) b) cmd/Makefile has redundant $$(pkg-config --libs $(X11PACKAGES)) w/ hardcoded -lXext c) cmd/click/Makefile has

[dev] make framework for wmii

2009-05-25 Thread KIMURA Masaru
Hi, I'm now browsing wmii hg2467. a) default config.mk has X11PACKAGES=xft and INCX11=$$(pkg-config --cflags $(X11PACKAGES)) b) cmd/Makefile has redundant $$(pkg-config --libs $(X11PACKAGES)) w/ hardcoded -lXext c) cmd/click/Makefile has hardcoded -lXtst in LDFLAGS d) test/Makefile has $(LIBX1