Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-12 Thread Joerg Jung
Am 11.06.2013 um 18:26 schrieb Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>: >>> Also Christop/__20h__ is working on some mail client that sounded quite nice >>> and interesting from the description, but afaik it is not yet available(?). >> >> I've heard Christoph mention this, but never seen a description

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Alex Pilon wrote: > > On 11/06/13 at 09:18am, Alex Pilon wrote: > > > Any body know of a suckless method of using IMAP mostly > > > offline/disconnected? Offlineimap sucks and is brittle. > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 06:55:19PM +0400, Peter A. Shevtsov wrote: > >

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Alex Pilon
> On 11/06/13 at 09:18am, Alex Pilon wrote: > > Any body know of a suckless method of using IMAP mostly > > offline/disconnected? Offlineimap sucks and is brittle. > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 06:55:19PM +0400, Peter A. Shevtsov wrote: > I'm quite happy with fdm[1]. I would be, were it not capable o

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:26:17 +0200 Truls Becken wrote: > On 2013-06-10, at 21:35, Edgaras wrote: > > > Also Christop/__20h__ is working on some mail client that sounded quite nice > > and interesting from the description, but afaik it is not yet available(?). > > I've heard Christoph

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Dmitrij Czarkoff
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote: > I thought nmh's inc command would be able to convert maildir into the > nmh format and save it to a mail directory of your choosing for use > with nmh. If that's not the case I will have to rethink my approach. I'm not sure whether inc indeed

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Peter A. Shevtsov
On 11/06/13 at 09:18am, Alex Pilon wrote: > Any body know of a suckless method of using IMAP mostly > offline/disconnected? Offlineimap sucks and is brittle. I'm quite happy with fdm[1]. [1] http://fdm.sourceforge.net/ -- Peter A. Shevtsov

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Silvan Jegen
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote: > Isync only supports Maildir for local storage, while nmh uses mh > format, so they are incompatible. I thought nmh's inc command would be able to convert maildir into the nmh format and save it to a mail directory of your choosing for use

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Nick
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 02:06:10PM +, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Nick wrote: > > I use mbsync in several places and it works very well, and is a good > > deal simpler and more reasonable than offlineimap or isync. > > From what I gather isync is a wrapper aroun

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Dmitrij Czarkoff
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Nick wrote: > I use mbsync in several places and it works very well, and is a good > deal simpler and more reasonable than offlineimap or isync. >From what I gather isync is a wrapper around mbsync, which is only used to provide configuration file stability. -- D

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Dmitrij Czarkoff
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote: > I think I may try to use it with nmh/mmh next and see whether that > combination is even better. Isync only supports Maildir for local storage, while nmh uses mh format, so they are incompatible. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Nick
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:18:43AM -0400, Alex Pilon wrote: > Any body know of a suckless method of using IMAP mostly > offline/disconnected? Offlineimap sucks and is brittle. I use mbsync in several places and it works very well, and is a good deal simpler and more reasonable than offlineimap or

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Silvan Jegen
> There is isync ( http://isync.sourceforge.net/) , which appears to be a > saner implementation of OfflineIMAP's idea. I use isync with mutt and it works quite well. I think I may try to use it with nmh/mmh next and see whether that combination is even better.

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Dmitrij Czarkoff
On Jun 11, 2013 3:20 PM, "Alex Pilon" wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:35:33PM +0300, Edgaras wrote: > > Well mutt is niceish, but not suckless. (well at something like 20MB > > of ram > > In what state? Stripped, idle and no configuration (~5mb > shared+resident)? With a connection (let's ad

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Alex Pilon
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:35:33PM +0300, Edgaras wrote: > Well mutt is niceish, but not suckless. (well at something like 20MB > of ram In what state? Stripped, idle and no configuration (~5mb shared+resident)? With a connection (let's add TLS on top too for more overhead) opened to some remote s

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Truls Becken
On 2013-06-10, at 21:35, Edgaras wrote: > Also Christop/__20h__ is working on some mail client that sounded quite nice > and interesting from the description, but afaik it is not yet available(?). I've heard Christoph mention this, but never seen a description. Do you have a link? -Truls

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Michael Stevens
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:35:33PM +0300, Edgaras wrote: > As for alternatives, for some time I have tried heirloom mailx, which is > really > cli application, seems to have considerably smaller footprint. Though > interfaces is a bit rough, and since it seems it uses less(no?) caching its at > le

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread Michael Stevens
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:18:50PM +0200, Uli Armbruster wrote: > * Andrew Hills [10.06.2013 19:20]: > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens > > wrote: > > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? > > > > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. >

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-11 Thread markus schnalke
[2013-06-10 18:12] Michael Stevens > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? You might want to have a look at mmh. It's far from perfect, but it does some things quite well. http://marmaro.de/prog/mmh http://marmaro.de/docs/master meillo btw: If someone likes to write an MH storage vi

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-10 Thread Edgaras
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:18:50PM +0200, Uli Armbruster wrote: > * Andrew Hills [10.06.2013 19:20]: > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens > > wrote: > > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? > > > > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. >

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-10 Thread Uli Armbruster
* Andrew Hills [10.06.2013 19:20]: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens > wrote: > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? > > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. In case you don't instantly see this in Claws and didn't look into the header

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-10 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 06/10/13 at 01:20pm, Andrew Hills wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens > wrote: > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? > > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. > I always assumed that "suckless" was a nod to mutt's slogan: "All

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-10 Thread Andrew Hills
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens wrote: > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck.

[dev] mail clients

2013-06-10 Thread Michael Stevens
Are there any mail clients that don't suck?