Hi,
> ... If it's not, and you don't have a say in the matter,
> then there's obviously nothing you can do about it, no?
Yes it's a piece of software we have to use. This piece has gnome
keyring as their dependency.
My hope was to define another implementation like
https://github.com/grawity/secr
>D-Bus is bloat in itself and should be avoided if possible, just like related
>bloatware such as systemd.
>
>[1]: https://github.com/grawity/secretsd
+1
I've yet to see a good reason to use dbus.
On 23/10/10 01:04PM, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> It all depends on the degree of your agency over the choice of software and
> over the software itself. If it's a program you wrote, then consider
> switching
> away from D-Bus to interfacing with a simpler/better/more traditional
> solution,
> like
On 23/10/10 10:33AM, Marko Bauhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> i have to use a program at work which requires libsecret - Secret
> Service D-Bus client library.
> Right now I'm using the gnome keyring implementation.
> I would like to get rid of this implementation and use a more simpler
> one, in other words
Hi,
i have to use a program at work which requires libsecret - Secret
Service D-Bus client library.
Right now I'm using the gnome keyring implementation.
I would like to get rid of this implementation and use a more simpler
one, in other words without gnome/kde deps.
Do you know any suckless alter
