On 21/09/2012, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> if you want reliability don't use a computer.
>
if you want reliability don't use the world.
if you want reliability don't use a computer.
* Christophe-Marie Duquesne [2012-09-21 16:00]:
Why not zeromq? It seems to be light, simple and performant. It also
has extended documentation, and a large community to support it.
Allegedly, zeromq puts speed before reliability. Who would really want to use
that?
Regards,
Andreas
that would be reinventing the wheel, node.js does already all this and
much more.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:53:56PM +0200, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why not zeromq? It seems to be light, simple and performant. It also
> has extended documentation, and a large community to support it.
>
> Tof
>
Why not a js library
Hi,
Why not zeromq? It seems to be light, simple and performant. It also
has extended documentation, and a large community to support it.
Tof
Well, just to note, wmii+ixp are not hosted on suckless anymore.
There is still the wmii page[0] and archives on the downloads page[1].
The new home is on google-code[2] and maybe you can find some
answers on the bugtracker[3].
There is also #wmii on oftc irc, afaik.
[0]: http://wmii.suckless.org/
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:33 PM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> why not a cloud service?
The communication will be done between desktop components, so using
cloud here is a bit questionable :) But thanks for proposal.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Ivan Kanakarakis
wrote:
> you maybe interes
On 20 September 2012 16:56, Sanel Zukan wrote:
> I'm searching alternative to DBus, as the project itself became quite
> polarized and because DBus can't be compiled on platforms without
> pthread support, except win32.
>
> libixp looks quite suitable alternative for me; it is small, it is
> easy
you maybe interested in unixbus
http://unixbus.org/
http://unixbus.org/ubus/
On 20 September 2012 22:33, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> why not a cloud service?
>
>
--
*Ivan c00kiemon5ter V Kanakarakis* >:3
why not a cloud service?
> Have you considered FIFOs and/or sockets?
>
> Oh, you want win32... INET sockets as a fallback?
Yes, and would end up probably with similar library like libixp or
DBus, as both have ability to communicate either locally or via tcp
which is quite desired in my case.
Also, DBus exports objects on
Somebody claiming to be Sanel Zukan wrote:
I'm searching alternative to DBus, as the project itself became quite
polarized and because DBus can't be compiled on platforms without
pthread support, except win32.
Have you considered FIFOs and/or sockets?
Oh, you want win32... INET sockets as a fa
Hi all,
I'm searching alternative to DBus, as the project itself became quite
polarized and because DBus can't be compiled on platforms without
pthread support, except win32.
libixp looks quite suitable alternative for me; it is small, it is
easy to hack and (hopefully) easy to port on different
14 matches
Mail list logo
