Re: [dev] (dwm 6.0) Mod1-, Mod1-. (next/prev screen) keybindings don't work

2013-05-30 Thread Jens Nyberg
2013/5/30 Kevin Foster > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jens Nyberg wrote: > >> Perhaps a stupid questio >> > Not a stupid question... unless you were referring to mine. Sorry, I > goofed. > >> You do have two screens right? Can you see dwm on both of them? >> > No, I don't have two screens. I

Re: [dev] (dwm 6.0) Mod1-, Mod1-. (next/prev screen) keybindings don't work

2013-05-30 Thread Jens Nyberg
2013/5/30 Kevin Foster > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jens Nyberg wrote: > >> Perhaps a stupid questio >> > Not a stupid question... unless you were referring to mine. Sorry, I > goofed. > >> You do have two screens right? Can you see dwm on both of them? >> > No, I don't have two screens. I

Re: [dev] (dwm 6.0) Mod1-, Mod1-. (next/prev screen) keybindings don't work

2013-05-30 Thread Kevin Foster
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jens Nyberg wrote: > Perhaps a stupid questio > Not a stupid question... unless you were referring to mine. Sorry, I goofed. > You do have two screens right? Can you see dwm on both of them? > No, I don't have two screens. I made this mistake because I conflated

Re: [dev] (dwm 6.0) Mod1-, Mod1-. (next/prev screen) keybindings don't work

2013-05-30 Thread Jens Nyberg
Perhaps a stupid questio Den 30 maj 2013 18:27 skrev "Kevin Foster" : > > Hello, > > I have recently been looking for a tiling WM and like dwm so far. I have one problem I can't figure out. The default keybinds for next/previous screen (using Mod1 and the comma and period keys), as well as the "sen

Re: [dev] (dwm 6.0) Mod1-, Mod1-. (next/prev screen) keybindings don't work

2013-05-30 Thread Chris Down
On 31 May 2013 00:27, "Kevin Foster" wrote: > > Hello, > > I have recently been looking for a tiling WM and like dwm so far. I have one problem I can't figure out. The default keybinds for next/previous screen (using Mod1 and the comma and period keys), as well as the "send" function (Mod1-shift-,

[dev] (dwm 6.0) Mod1-, Mod1-. (next/prev screen) keybindings don't work

2013-05-30 Thread Kevin Foster
Hello, I have recently been looking for a tiling WM and like dwm so far. I have one problem I can't figure out. The default keybinds for next/previous screen (using Mod1 and the comma and period keys), as well as the "send" function (Mod1-shift-, or .) don't work for me. I've tried the following:

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-05-09 Thread Hugues Moretto-Viry
2013/5/8 Jente Hidskes > Hugues, > > I am still on my ... erhm.. "gap year trip" around Europe, I don't have a > second monitor at hand and until I do, I won't test this patch. Sure, I > can try make it work on pertag2 but testing you will have to do yourself > afterwards. > > Cheers, > > Jente >

RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-05-08 Thread Jente Hidskes
2013 11:03:53 +0200 Subject: Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup From: hugues.more...@gmail.com To: dev@suckless.org Jente, Any news about this patch? I tried to apply it but I was unable to do it, with pertag2. Regards -- H.Mo.

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-05-08 Thread Hugues Moretto-Viry
Jente, Any news about this patch? I tried to apply it but I was unable to do it, with pertag2. Regards -- H.Mo.

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-23 Thread Hugues Moretto-Viry
2013/4/22 Carlos Torres > It has been argued before that the use of named tags is somewhat a > misunderstanding of dwm. > Yeah, it's was a misnomer. Personally, I was thinking about workspaces, but I always called it tags. Anyway, Jente, did you try it with statuscolors and / or pertag? Kind Re

RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-23 Thread Jente Hidskes
Actually, I have a question: does this work with the client rules? > From: jthids...@outlook.com > To: dev@suckless.org > Subject: RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:39:23 +0200 > >

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-23 Thread Carlos Torres
it to my DWM regardless. I will report back later. > > Cheers, > > Jente > > >> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:29:19 +0200 >> From: dl...@itsatrap.se >> To: dev@suckless.org >> Subject: RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists fo

RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-23 Thread Jente Hidskes
a second monitor to test this with, but I'm going to apply it to my DWM regardless. I will report back later. Cheers, Jente > Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:29:19 +0200 > From: dl...@itsatrap.se > To: dev@suckless.org > Subject: RE: [dev]

RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-23 Thread David Lind
Jente __ Van: David Lind Verzonden: 23-4-2013 10:08 Aan: dev mail list Onderwerp: Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup I recieved an "off-list" email yesterday from a guy with a patch for my problem. I will try it out and see how it works. Let me know if

RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-23 Thread Jente Hidskes
Hey, I sure am! Can you maybe upload it somewhere public so everyone can access it? Thanks, Jente Van: David Lind Verzonden: 23-4-2013 10:08 Aan: dev mail list Onderwerp: Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup I recieved an "off

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-23 Thread David Lind
I recieved an "off-list" email yesterday from a guy with a patch for my problem. I will try it out and see how it works. Let me know if anyone else is interested in obtaining the patch and trying it. /David

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-22 Thread Carlos Torres
>> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:05:06 +0200 >> Subject: Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup >> From: kalle...@gmail.com >> To: dev@suckless.org >> >> >> It's not really meant to be used as workspaces, rath

RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-22 Thread Jente Hidskes
rs, Jente > Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:05:06 +0200 > Subject: Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup > From: kalle...@gmail.com > To: dev@suckless.org > > > It's not really meant to be used as workspaces, rath

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-21 Thread KarlOskar Rikås
It's not really meant to be used as workspaces, rather like tags in wmii or original acme I think. On Apr 21, 2013 8:12 PM, "David Lind" wrote: > Hi, > > I couldn't find a patch for this(but I may have missed it?).. I want to > have separate taglists on my monitors, e.g: > > Monitor 1 -> coding w

RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-21 Thread Carlos Torres
It has been argued before that the use of named tags is somewhat a misunderstanding of dwm. There are subtleties about dwm that I myself don't get yet, and about six or five keymaps that I don't use regularly but which I should, because they might one day allow me to fully understand. "I urge you

RE: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-21 Thread Jente Hidskes
Hi, Me too would like this. Cheers, Jente

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-21 Thread Hugues Moretto-Viry
Hi, I would love to find a similar patch, me too. I think having all the tags on both screen, is redundant. Best Regards -- H.Mo.

[dev] dwm 6.0 - separate taglists for muli-monitor setup

2013-04-21 Thread David Lind
Hi, I couldn't find a patch for this(but I may have missed it?).. I want to have separate taglists on my monitors, e.g: Monitor 1 -> coding www txt Monitor 2 -> pdf media irc Is there a patch for such a thing? :-) Regards, David Lind

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 xinerama video

2012-02-22 Thread Uli Armbruster
* Connor Lane Smith [22.02.2012 15:18]: > Hey, > > On 22 February 2012 08:30, Uli Armbruster > wrote: > > You named the video "... NEW Xinerama support". Just curious, what was it > > like before? I've only been using dwm with two monitors since version 6.0 > > came out. > > I think it's a j

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 xinerama video

2012-02-22 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 22 February 2012 08:30, Uli Armbruster wrote: > You named the video "... NEW Xinerama support". Just curious, what was it > like before? I've only been using dwm with two monitors since version 6.0 > came out. I think it's a jokey reference to the dwm page [1], which says > NEW dwm cr

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0 xinerama video

2012-02-22 Thread Uli Armbruster
* Kai Hendry [22.02.2012 08:09]: > Hey there, > > I've uploaded an embarrassing howto video of how to gain a neck injury > using dwm 6.0 > > http://youtu.be/UJuvLOQzSOc > > Enjoy, You named the video "... NEW Xinerama support". Just curious, what was it like before? I've only been using dwm w

[dev] dwm 6.0 xinerama video

2012-02-21 Thread Kai Hendry
Hey there, I've uploaded an embarrassing howto video of how to gain a neck injury using dwm 6.0 http://youtu.be/UJuvLOQzSOc Enjoy,

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-29 Thread Nick
I just upgraded from 5.9, and 6.0 looks great. It's the first time I've used nmaster, and it works really well for my tiny laptop screen usecase. I expect it to work well in a different way for my enormous screen at work too. Which is great as I now don't need any patches, and things all work g

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-20 Thread Jimmy Tang
+1 on the return of nmaster support, it works great on my large wide screen displays in work! Regards, Jimmy Tang -- Senior Software Engineer, National Audio Visual Repository (NAVR) Trinity Centre for High Performance Computing, Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. http://

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Thomas Dean
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:21:28 -0500, Andrew Hills wrote: > > Of course, now I see it: 0=infinity in this case, i.e. slave effectively > > becomes master :-) > > Be careful when creating a power vacuum. Eliminating the remaining > authority will lead to anarchy as the slaves all scramble to crea

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Stefan Mark
On 19.12.2011 17:21, Andrew Hills wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Dean <78...@web.de> wrote: >> Of course, now I see it: 0=infinity in this case, i.e. slave effectively >> becomes master :-) > > Be careful when creating a power vacuum. Eliminating the remaining > authority will l

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Andrew Hills
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Dean <78...@web.de> wrote: > Of course, now I see it: 0=infinity in this case, i.e. slave effectively > becomes master :-) Be careful when creating a power vacuum. Eliminating the remaining authority will lead to anarchy as the slaves all scramble to create

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Thomas Dean
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 16:50:01 +0100, Manolo Martínez wrote: > (M == Mod1, right?) What I'm seeing is that, if I press Mod1-i (-d), say 3 > times too many, then I need to press Mod1-d (-i) *4* times for it to have any > effect. Also, when nmaster=1 and pressing Mod1-d, nmaster seems to become i

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Thomas Dean
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 17:08:54 +0100, Thomas Dean wrote: > > (M == Mod1, right?) What I'm seeing is that, if I press Mod1-i (-d), say 3 > > times too many, then I need to press Mod1-d (-i) *4* times for it to have > > any effect. > > Also, when nmaster=1 and pressing Mod1-d, nmaster seems to be

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 19 December 2011 16:50, Manolo Martínez wrote: > On 12/19/11 at 04:40pm, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >> On 19 December 2011 16:39, Manolo Martínez wrote: >> > A question regarding this functionality -- feel free to forward me to >> > documentation, if there is such --. If I use Mod1-i and have tw

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On 19 December 2011 16:50, Manolo Martínez wrote: > (M == Mod1, right?) What I'm seeing is that, if I press Mod1-i (-d), say 3 > times too many, then I need to press Mod1-d (-i) *4* times for it to have any > effect. Indeed, that's correct. Remember, dwm's layout is per-monitor, not per-tag. As

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Manolo Martínez
Connor, thanks for replying. On 12/19/11 at 04:40pm, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > On 19 December 2011 16:39, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > A question regarding this functionality -- feel free to forward me to > > documentation, if there is such --. If I use Mod1-i and have two windows in > > the > >

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 19 December 2011 16:39, Manolo Martínez wrote: > A question regarding this functionality -- feel free to forward me to > documentation, if there is such --. If I use Mod1-i and have two windows in > the > master column, and then delete any other windows, I am stuck with horizontal > tili

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hi, thanks for the new version! On 12/19/11 at 04:16pm, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > - the return of the nmaster functionality (Mod1-i, Mod1-d) A question regarding this functionality -- feel free to forward me to documentation, if there is such --. If I use Mod1-i and have two windows in the master c

[dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi there, I'm glad to announce a new dwm release which can be downloaded from: http://dl.suckless.org/dwm/dwm-6.0.tar.gz This release contains - several Xinerama fixes - a new approach to hide clients into negative space rather than positive - the return of the nmaster functionality (Mod1-i,