Re: [dev] DWM 5.6.1 and pertag patch

2009-08-31 Thread Bartosz Nitkiewicz
Dnia poniedziałek 31 sierpień 2009 o 14:45:54 Ray Kohler napisał(a): > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Bartosz > > Nitkiewicz wrote: > > Hello everyone. > > I have problem with pertag patch on DWM 5.6.1. I try to patch source but > > with no result. Patch was found on ML (attached). I also attach

Re: [dev] DWM 5.6.1 and pertag patch

2009-08-31 Thread Ray Kohler
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Bartosz Nitkiewicz wrote: > Hello everyone. > I have problem with pertag patch on DWM 5.6.1. I try to patch source but with > no result. Patch was found on ML (attached). I also attached dwm.c.rej file. > Could somebody help me to solve this problem becouse patch

[dev] DWM 5.6.1 and pertag patch

2009-08-31 Thread Bartosz Nitkiewicz
Hello everyone. I have problem with pertag patch on DWM 5.6.1. I try to patch source but with no result. Patch was found on ML (attached). I also attached dwm.c.rej file. Could somebody help me to solve this problem becouse patch is very usefull. P.S. Sorry for mu ang. *** *** 1596,1

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-27 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2009/7/27 James PIC : > Why depend on xinerama for multihead setups instead of randr? Xrandr(3) doesn't provide a simple interface to manage multiple screens, Xinerama(3) is much more convenient and much simpler as well. If Xrandr(3) is changed accordingly to provide a similiar simple interface, I

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-27 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2009/7/27 Claudio M. Alessi : > this with xinerama support disabled: > >        dwm.c: In function ‘updategeom’: >        dwm.c:1686: warning: unused variable ‘nn’ > > It should be declared inside the #ifdef XINERAMA block. > > FWIW, I have no problems at all with dwm. I Couldn't image a better way

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-27 Thread James PIC
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:51 AM, James PIC wrote: > I though xinerama uses software and randr uses hardware, isn't that > supposed to be more optimal? > PS: Subquestion: wouldn't it have required less source diff?

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-27 Thread James PIC
Hi Anselm, Sorry if this questions were already answered before. Why depend on xinerama for multihead setups instead of randr? I though xinerama uses software and randr uses hardware, isn't that supposed to be more optimal? Is there a nice CLI tool for xinerama like xrandr for randr? If not, s

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-27 Thread Claudio M. Alessi
Hi, this with xinerama support disabled: dwm.c: In function ‘updategeom’: dwm.c:1686: warning: unused variable ‘nn’ It should be declared inside the #ifdef XINERAMA block. FWIW, I have no problems at all with dwm. I Couldn't image a better way to deal with my X clients. I'm not

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-26 Thread Donald Allen
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm glad to announce a new bugfix release of dwm: > >  http://code.suckless.org/dl/dwm/dwm-5.6.1.tar.gz > > This release contains several man page fixes and a fixed Xinerama > handling if all reported screens are of the same ori

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-26 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 7/26/09, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > http://code.suckless.org/dl/dwm/dwm-5.6.1.tar.gz > > This release contains several man page fixes and a fixed Xinerama > handling if all reported screens are of the same origin geometry. and no shrinking of windows with fixed aspect ratio

[dev] dwm-5.6.1

2009-07-26 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi there, I'm glad to announce a new bugfix release of dwm: http://code.suckless.org/dl/dwm/dwm-5.6.1.tar.gz This release contains several man page fixes and a fixed Xinerama handling if all reported screens are of the same origin geometry. Kind regards, Anselm