The call to XkbKeycodeToKeysym always returns zero for me when I run
dwm through RealVNC, probably because it sucks. Attached is the patch
against tip (reverting 737cf52cd031) for others forced to run dwm on
shitty systems.
--Andrew Hills
dwm-keycode-to-keysym-vnc-fix.patch
Description: Binary d
On 16 May 2012 03:41, James Turner wrote:
> XKeycodeToKeysym was deprecated on 2011-10-10 [0]. The included patch
> updates dwm.c to use XkbKeycodeToKeysym instead.
>
> [0]
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/commit/include/X11?id=f2651e03f3295a453a2965c3749bc8b6e66f1c09
Thanks, applied
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 07:42:07PM +0300, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> are you an Ubuntu user ?
no, i am an adult.
On 16 May 2012 16:06, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:34:25PM +0300, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> > XKeycodeToKeysym returns faulty results in some cases/layouts.
>
> Thanks, this is the sort of information I was looking for.
>
>
are you an Ubuntu user ?
--
*Ivan c00kiemon5ter V K
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:34:25PM +0300, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> XKeycodeToKeysym returns faulty results in some cases/layouts.
Thanks, this is the sort of information I was looking for.
XKeycodeToKeysym returns faulty results in some cases/layouts.
[0] Here is the original bug report
[1] Here is the deprecation proposal
[2] And the changelog linking to [0]
[0]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25732
[1]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5349
[2]: htt
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:12:58PM +0100, Rob wrote:
> You were arguing that it's bad because it's the "latest" mandate.
No, I'm arguing that it's bad because it introduces more shit, and
nobody has yet been able to explain what benefit that cost brings.
> I call subtle trolling
I call terrible
On 16 May 2012 02:58, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:52:10PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
>>
>> XKBlib.h has been around since 1993 is an extra header file really that
>> bad?
>
> Are you arguing that it's good code because it's old code?
You were arguing that it's bad because it'
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:58:43PM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:52:10PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> >
> > XKBlib.h has been around since 1993 is an extra header file really that
> > bad?
>
> Are you arguing that it's good code because it's old code?
>
Nope, I'm not a
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:52:10PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
>
> XKBlib.h has been around since 1993 is an extra header file really that
> bad?
Are you arguing that it's good code because it's old code?
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:48:51PM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:41:46PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> > XKeycodeToKeysym was deprecated on 2011-10-10 [0]. The included patch
> > updates dwm.c to use XkbKeycodeToKeysym instead.
>
>
> Is there any benefit to this other tha
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:41:46PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> XKeycodeToKeysym was deprecated on 2011-10-10 [0]. The included patch
> updates dwm.c to use XkbKeycodeToKeysym instead.
Is there any benefit to this other than introducing xkb as a dependency?
We don't all run dwm on the latest free
Just what I've been waiting for. Thanks!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:41 PM, James Turner wrote:
> XKeycodeToKeysym was deprecated on 2011-10-10 [0]. The included patch
> updates dwm.c to use XkbKeycodeToKeysym instead.
>
> [0]
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/commit/include/X11?id=f
XKeycodeToKeysym was deprecated on 2011-10-10 [0]. The included patch
updates dwm.c to use XkbKeycodeToKeysym instead.
[0]
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/commit/include/X11?id=f2651e03f3295a453a2965c3749bc8b6e66f1c09
--
James Turner
ja...@calminferno.net
diff -r 48309b14abb9 dwm.c
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
