Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe-dig...@suckless.org

2012-12-25 Thread Chris Hall
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Johny Why wrote: > dev+unsubscribe-dig...@suckless.org You send a message to that address (body isn't important). ~cjh

[dev] dev+unsubscribe-dig...@suckless.org

2012-12-25 Thread Johny Why
dev+unsubscribe-dig...@suckless.org

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe, I think it is better to avoid the bloat

2010-05-14 Thread Marvin Vek
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:35:41AM +0200, hiro wrote: > That's why I always said "suckless" is stupid. People have too high > expectations when they read it! It's not plan9 enough!! -- Marvin Vek - /* * We used to try various strange things. Let's not. */ linux-2.2.16/fs/buffer.c

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe, I think it is better to avoid the bloat

2010-05-14 Thread hiro
That's why I always said "suckless" is stupid. People have too high expectations when they read it!

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe, I think it is better to avoid the bloat

2010-05-14 Thread Aurélien Aptel
«Dawning horror tinged with self-loathing crept slowly over the face of mobi phil as he described his "text editor" and by extension his vision of "suckless" to others during a seemingly innocuous email exchange.» Uriel was *not even* involved. A weird (and incredible) day, indeed.

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe, I think it is better to avoid the bloat

2010-05-14 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:55 PM, mobi phil wrote: > By the way. Ion3 is less bloated than any of the wi, wii, wi, > wii or drm... Isn't it a bloat or "not suckles" to have the same 3 > times? Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? -- # Kurt

[dev] dev+unsubscribe, I think it is better to avoid the bloat

2010-05-14 Thread mobi phil
Well, I had a funny day here, but I think I knocked at the wrong door... By the way. Ion3 is less bloated than any of the wi, wii, wi, wii or drm... Isn't it a bloat or "not suckles" to have the same 3 times? Anders Andersson said "You're insane". Two of them in the same place is too dang

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread Moritz Wilhelmy
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:47:00PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: > [2009-11-09 10:21] Kris Maglione > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:02:56PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: > > > > > >Aren't they able to take a look at the List-Unsubscribe header? > > > > Apparently. Look closely: > > > To: "dev+un

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-11-09 10:21] Kris Maglione > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:02:56PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: > > > >Aren't they able to take a look at the List-Unsubscribe header? > > Apparently. Look closely: > To: "dev+unsubscr...@suckless.org" *LOL* meillo

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread Kris Maglione
lto:dev+unsubscr...@suckless.org> ... To: "dev+unsubscr...@suckless.org" Subject: [dev] dev+unsubscribe -- Kris Maglione If you want to go somewhere, goto is the best way to get there. --Ken Thompson

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-11-09 09:35] Kris Maglione > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:30:41AM -0500, Robert C Corsaro wrote: > >dev+unsubscribe > > Annoying, isn't it? How many people do I have to manually > unsubscribe? Aren't they able to take a look at the List-Unsubscribe header? meillo

Re: [dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread Kris Maglione
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:30:41AM -0500, Robert C Corsaro wrote: dev+unsubscribe Annoying, isn't it? How many people do I have to manually unsubscribe? -- Kris Maglione For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. --H. L. Mencken

[dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-11-09 Thread Robert C Corsaro
dev+unsubscribe

[dev] dev+unsubscribe

2009-08-20 Thread hiro
This has also gotten too much for me . I hereby unsubscribe. Officially. On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Nils wrote: > You guys make me wanna unsubscribe, too. ;) > >