Re: [dev] an approach to Matrix client that sucks less

2020-03-04 Thread anigger
tox didn't die it's alive and well On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 20:54:42 +0100 Laslo Hunhold wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:44:19 -0500 > "Greg Reagle" wrote: > > Dear Greg, > > > Hi y'all. I don't see any Matrix client at > > https://suckless.org/rocks/ or https://suckless.org/other_projects/ > >

Re: [dev] an approach to Matrix client that sucks less

2020-02-25 Thread Laslo Hunhold
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:33:25 -0500 "Greg Reagle" wrote: Dear Greg, > Thank you Laslo Hunhold for your feedback. sure, happy to give it! :) > Based on your other comments, I assume that when you stress the > importance of the "interface", you are not referring to end-user > interface (like comm

Re: [dev] an approach to Matrix client that sucks less

2020-02-20 Thread Greg Reagle
Thank you Laslo Hunhold for your feedback. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020, at 14:54, Laslo Hunhold wrote: > yes, we haven't looked into Matrix much here. I have to admit that it's > the most promising protocol out there, in my opinion. What matters for > a suckless client is the interface. Based on your o

Re: [dev] an approach to Matrix client that sucks less

2020-02-20 Thread Laslo Hunhold
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:44:19 -0500 "Greg Reagle" wrote: Dear Greg, > Hi y'all. I don't see any Matrix client at > https://suckless.org/rocks/ or https://suckless.org/other_projects/ > and I am thinking of making one. I use the Riot.im web app client > which has a lot of features, but is bloate

[dev] an approach to Matrix client that sucks less

2020-02-20 Thread Greg Reagle
Hi y'all. I don't see any Matrix client at https://suckless.org/rocks/ or https://suckless.org/other_projects/ and I am thinking of making one. I use the Riot.im web app client which has a lot of features, but is bloated. Do any of you know of a Matrix client that is not bloated? I have looke