Re: [dev] Windows binaries

2013-04-19 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Noah Birnel wrote: > Static linking needs mingw and I haven't done it. Considering you need X > for the 3 progs mentioned above, I've seen no point in carrying them > around to windows boxes without Cygwin. I don't remember which project had at one point an incom

Re: [dev] Windows binaries

2013-04-18 Thread Noah Birnel
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 08:26:37PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Greetings comrades, > > Anyone has built binaries on Windows of suckless projects and may pro??? > vide a wiki page about how it was done. Greetings from the cygwin ghetto! No wiki page, but: dwm, dmenu, and st all build jus

Re: [dev] Windows binaries

2013-04-18 Thread Nick
> This is about helping your fellow victims of Redmond oligopoly. I'm not sure providing Windows binaries would be a good way of doing that. And reports of issues on the mailing list from Windows users unwilling to compile their own software strikes me as an annoying possibility. But. I have u

[dev] Windows binaries

2013-04-18 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings comrades, people have been asking for Windows binaries of Suckless projects. The easiest way for this seems to be using Cygwin. Since Windows users are easy to satisfy by just having something that runs and rapes your family in the meanwhile, it should be possible to only compile