On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:54:43 +0200
> Silvan Jegen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:16:06PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:08:08 +0200
>> > Silvan Jegen wrote:
> [...]
>> The Wayland protocol deals with input as well so
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:04:20PM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> Quote:
> Display server expert Daniel Stone explains what is really happening
Display server expert.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 08:41:57PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:33:39 +0200
> > Silvan Jegen wrote:
> >
> > Hey Silvan,
> >
> > > One can argue that having a simple protocol *is* the suckless part of
> > > Wayland (dont forget
It was indeed quite interesting decision from Fedora. It seems that
Fedora is serious about it.
"The rumors of its death are greatly exaggerated... Sailfish OS has been
using Wayland from the start and Fedora wants to make Wayland the default
for their next release (I wouldn't count on it)."
2016
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:54:43 +0200
Silvan Jegen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:16:06PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:08:08 +0200
> > Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > > Since Wayland is only a protocol, as long as both the
> > > client and the server follow it closely enough both
> >
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:16:06PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:08:08 +0200
> Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > Since Wayland is only a protocol, as long as both the client and the
> > server follow it closely enough both the clients and the server will
> > be happy. What is crucial is that t
I believe that we will have to strive to keep X11.
2016-08-02 20:33 GMT+02:00 Silvan Jegen :
> Heyho
>
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:27:49PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:04:20 +0200
>> patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
>>
>> Hey Patrick,
>>
>> > Do you believe that Wayland will re
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:08:08 +0200
Silvan Jegen wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the goal of the Wayland devs is to keep the
> required protocols to a minimum and graduate prooven protocol
> extensions to official Wayland ones.
It sounds good on paper, but really turns out to be a horrible mess
in
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 08:41:57PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:33:39 +0200
> Silvan Jegen wrote:
>
> Hey Silvan,
>
> > One can argue that having a simple protocol *is* the suckless part of
> > Wayland (dont forget Xprint[0] :P). The Wayland protocol also does not
> > allow for co
this has been discussed here often enough.
just discuss this bullshit with your hackernews friends next time.
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:33:39 +0200
Silvan Jegen wrote:
Hey Silvan,
> One can argue that having a simple protocol *is* the suckless part of
> Wayland (dont forget Xprint[0] :P). The Wayland protocol also does not
> allow for communication between clients directly[1] but only through
> the Wayland
Heyho
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:27:49PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:04:20 +0200
> patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
>
> Hey Patrick,
>
> > Do you believe that Wayland will replace X11 one day?;)
>
> this is a tough question to answer. If we are headed on the current
> cou
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:04:20 +0200
patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
Hey Patrick,
> Do you believe that Wayland will replace X11 one day?;)
this is a tough question to answer. If we are headed on the current
course, I think we will face even more difficult times in the future
with worse mon
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:04:20 +0200
patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> Hi,
Ahoy!
>
> Do you believe that Wayland will replace X11 one
> day?;)
Yes — and it will be horrible.
The worst part of Wayland it encourages you
to write your own display server with all of
features in one single pr
Hi,
Do you believe that Wayland will replace X11 one day?;)
Besides, don't you believe that Ubuntu may have time to time some
negative influence on Linux phylosophy?
Quote:
Display server expert Daniel Stone explains what is really happening
with the future of graphical display protocols on
15 matches
Mail list logo
