Re: [dev] Surf 0.4 issues

2010-06-21 Thread Donald Allen
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > > On 21 Jun 2010, at 14:13, Donald Allen wrote: > > 2. When I change config.def.h and redo the make, config.h does *not* get > replaced with the new config.def.h. I think the config.h target in the > makefile is missing a dependency on

Re: [dev] Surf 0.4 issues

2010-06-21 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 21 Jun 2010, at 14:13, Donald Allen wrote: 2. When I change config.def.h and redo the make, config.h does *not* get replaced with the new config.def.h. I think the config.h target in the makefile is missing a dependency on config.def.h. Looks like it's the same as dwm, which I made this

Re: [dev] Surf 0.4 issues

2010-06-21 Thread Donald Allen
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Nicolai Waniek wrote: > I guess you should make your configuration changes to config.h instead > of config.def.h. the latter one is there to have some 'reference > configuration' if you have f***ed up your config.h. > Ah. Before making changes to something like t

Re: [dev] Surf 0.4 issues

2010-06-21 Thread anonymous
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 09:13:44AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote: > 1. Gmail complains that "your browser has cookies disabled" unless the > sessiontime variable in config.def.h is set to something non-zero. Perhaps > something non-zero should be the default (said without understanding the > implicatio

Re: [dev] Surf 0.4 issues

2010-06-21 Thread Nicolai Waniek
I guess you should make your configuration changes to config.h instead of config.def.h. the latter one is there to have some 'reference configuration' if you have f***ed up your config.h. regards

[dev] Surf 0.4 issues

2010-06-21 Thread Donald Allen
I've just begun using surf and it looks very nice. dwm is my desktop environment on a Slackware 13.1 system, and surf integrates nicely with it. Having said that, I have seen some problems that I'd like to report. Issues (version 0.4): 1. Gmail complains that "your browser has cookies disabled"