> complicated? is the most simple implementation for storing data. why non
> transparent?
I'm not sure I understood the whole concept yet, will have to do some
more reading.
I guess I'm making it more difficult than it is...
On 05/06/11 16:28, hiro wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:38 PM, pancake wrote:
You may like starting to play with sdb.
http://hg.youterm.com/sdb
Its a nosql-like (key-value db) based on cdb, but with a decent api and aiming
to provide a memcache network protocol. Its about 1000 LOC atm.
Cont
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:38 PM, pancake wrote:
> You may like starting to play with sdb.
>
> http://hg.youterm.com/sdb
>
> Its a nosql-like (key-value db) based on cdb, but with a decent api and
> aiming to provide a memcache network protocol. Its about 1000 LOC atm.
>
> Contribs are welcome
I d
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:58:33 -0500, Hank D wrote:
> [...] but I really want an email client that isn't total ass.
You may find what you're looking for in notmuch [1].
Even if you do somehow come to the conclusion that it's total ass,
the amount of ass would still be notmuch.
Considerable less th
Despite Mutt does a good job for me, today I tried Heirloom mailx[1] and I'm
hooked to its simplicity.
[1] http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/mailx.html
--
Ricardo
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:49 AM, SHRIZZA wrote:
>> You know, we could all say we're using shitty MUAs because we see
>> the rendered HTML rather than the plain-text component. ;) Even
>> HTML-only mail can be converted to plain text.
>
> Solution: use mutt.
Real solution:
Exterminate all Apple us
You may like starting to play with sdb.
http://hg.youterm.com/sdb
Its a nosql-like (key-value db) based on cdb, but with a decent api and aiming
to provide a memcache network protocol. Its about 1000 LOC atm.
Contribs are welcome
On 03/05/2011, at 20:12, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
Gmail's "basic html view" sucks least at least for a lazy ass like me.
I'm still waiting for the plan9 cloud 2.0 alternative though.
mail.google.com/mail/h/
2011/4/9 Łukasz Pankowski :
> Bjartur Thorlacius writes:
>
>> On 4/6/11, Hank D wrote:
>>> The problem is that mutt sucks, too.
>>>
>> Tru
Bjartur Thorlacius writes:
> On 4/6/11, Hank D wrote:
>> The problem is that mutt sucks, too.
>>
> True. It can be configured to suck even less, though. But I want a
> minimalist alternative that's configured to suck less *at build time*.
>
>> If the default for a text-based MUA is not to just d
On 4/6/11, Hank D wrote:
> The problem is that mutt sucks, too.
>
True. It can be configured to suck even less, though. But I want a
minimalist alternative that's configured to suck less *at build time*.
> If the default for a text-based MUA is not to just display text,
> something's awry.
>
IMO,
The problem is that mutt sucks, too.
If the default for a text-based MUA is not to just display text,
something's awry.
Not to mention the very outdated model of email it uses and the lack
of support for multiple email accounts.
Actually, I shouldn't say that. There's at least 3 different ways t
> You know, we could all say we're using shitty MUAs because we see
> the rendered HTML rather than the plain-text component. ;) Even
> HTML-only mail can be converted to plain text.
Solution: use mutt.
In ~/.muttrc:
alternative_order text/plain
auto_view text/html
set ma
I'll look at the source. I don't think I'll be able to accomplish
much, but I really want an email client that isn't total ass.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
>
> On 3 Apr 2011, at 1:37 pm, Džen wrote:
>
>> I don't know what you guys think, but why not simply return me
On 3 Apr 2011, at 1:37 pm, Džen wrote:
I don't know what you guys think, but why not simply return messages
which contain a text/html attachment to the sender? Maybe like this
people might learn it someday and trash such shitty MUAs...
I think some mailing lists do this. Some simply drop all
I don't know what you guys think, but why not simply return messages
which contain a text/html attachment to the sender? Maybe like this
people might learn it someday and trash such shitty MUAs...
On 01/04/11 02:09am, hiro wrote:
> I just looked at the source and what is this shit?!?!
On 04/01/11 01:22, Andreas Wagner wrote:
Thanks for the information on the repository url change. I have
updated the archlinux AUR PKGBUILD:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39955
cool! I use the one in slpm :)
slpm -i dmc # hg clone http://hg.suckless.org/slpm
I use dmc to quickly se
On 1 Apr 2011, at 3:19 am, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, hiro wrote:
I just looked at the source and what is this shit?!?!
Yikes. I thought hiro was overreacting, until I looked at the
source of the HTML MIME part. Wow. That's "Office"-grade shit.
Horribly verbose,
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, hiro wrote:
I just looked at the source and what is this shit?!?!
Yikes. I thought hiro was overreacting, until I looked at the source of
the HTML MIME part. Wow. That's "Office"-grade shit. Horribly
verbose, and only aimed at a specific subset of browsers:
I just looked at the source and what is this shit?!?!
Fuck such enormous letters at such a time, is it possible to turn off
HTML in gmail??
Or better even - make *your* mail client suck less...
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:10 PM, pancake wrote:
> As long as they are suckless projects and I didnt find any time to work more
> on it im going to move the r
Thanks for the information on the repository url change. I have
updated the archlinux AUR PKGBUILD:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39955
I use dmc to quickly send files by email from the shell and I'm
interested in working on dmc because I would like it to be usable as
my primary email c
As long as they are suckless projects and I didnt find any time to work more on
it im going to move the repos to hg.suckless.org
This way the code will be part of the suckless project and more people will
have commit access to it.
It's ok for you guys? Anybody interested in working on them?
--
22 matches
Mail list logo
