es to access The Web
with few resources.
Ben
Original Message
From: Calvin Morrison
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 6:10 AM
To: dev mail list
Reply To: dev mail list
Subject: Re: [dev] Suckless web rendering engine
i've tested out dillo yesterday, and a bit today. it is very fast, but
lacks
Calvin Morrison said:
> lacks javascript.
See their "Plans" page.¹
> but fails badly on things with floating elements instead of tables.
According to their Changelog,² floating elements are already supported
in tip.
There was a time when I used dillo much, and it was exceptionally good.
These w
i've tested out dillo yesterday, and a bit today. it is very fast, but
lacks javascript. Overall useful for simpler pages (lwn for example),
but fails badly on things with floating elements instead of tables.
On 16 February 2015 at 02:40, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Marc Weber said:
>> also have
sed and awk are the best web browsers.
On 2/16/15, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Marc Weber said:
>> also have a look at: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(Software)
>
> Servo appears to suck a lot. They appear to focus on improving
> performance by spawning endless threads (complexity), and th
Marc Weber said:
> also have a look at: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(Software)
Servo appears to suck a lot. They appear to focus on improving
performance by spawning endless threads (complexity), and they require
specific custom version of compiler (quirkiness).
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 04:10:15PM -0200, Marc Collin wrote:
> Are there any plans for this?
You may try to contribute to Blink and Servo. They may still suck, though.
--
Teodoro Santoni
NetSurf's parser isn't suckless.
Here are some issues with their tokeniser.c
- Using switch statement and explicit case numbers to implement the
tokeniser FSM instead of simple gotos and implicit position-based FSM.
This means it has to go through that switch every time through the
main loop, eve
On 15 February 2015 at 19:02, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> check out dillo
>
> On 15 February 2015 at 13:52, Ralph Eastwood wrote:
>> On 15 February 2015 at 18:23, Marc Weber wrote:
>>> http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ could be close.
>>> also have a look at: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(Softw
check out dillo
On 15 February 2015 at 13:52, Ralph Eastwood wrote:
> On 15 February 2015 at 18:23, Marc Weber wrote:
>> http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ could be close.
>> also have a look at: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(Software)
>> In any case it looks like to be a lot of effort.
>>
>>
On 15 February 2015 at 18:23, Marc Weber wrote:
> http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ could be close.
> also have a look at: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(Software)
> In any case it looks like to be a lot of effort.
>
> Marc Weber
>
I've glanced at netsurf in passing (source code/design) etc.
http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ could be close.
also have a look at: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(Software)
In any case it looks like to be a lot of effort.
Marc Weber
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:13:12 -0800
Eric Pruitt wrote:
Hey Eric,
> Is such a thing even possible? I can't imagine there being a web
> rendering engine that this community would consider suckless that would
> also be useful for day-to-day web browsing.
yes, you are going the right direction.
We a
Eric Pruitt wrote:
> Is such a thing even possible? I can't imagine there being a web rendering
> engine that this community would consider suckless that would also be useful
> for day-to-day web browsing.
Heyho,
imho you can either have a suckless „rendering“ engine aka html2text or just
some sc
Marc Collin wrote:
> Are there any plans for this?
Have you tried Google Chrome?
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 04:10:15PM -0200, Marc Collin wrote:
> Are there any plans for this?
Is such a thing even possible? I can't imagine there being a web
rendering engine that this community would consider suckless that would
also be useful for day-to-day web browsing.
Eric
Are there any plans for this?
16 matches
Mail list logo
