On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 10:30 +0200, m...@datameer.com wrote:
> Sagar Acharya wrote:
> > Which are the filesystems which suckless recommends?
> >
> > In my view, simple ones are FAT32, ext2.
> >
> > I think journaling is required which I see as within disk backup. A
> > robust and easy fsck like p
I wonder whether filesystems could be more layered. You can already do this to
some extent with LUKS and LVM on Linux, but could you go further? Rather than
having a big monolithic filesystem like ext4, could you run some simpler
filesystem that just did journaling, then on top of that one that
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:08:42PM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> > Which are the filesystems which suckless recommends?
> >
> > In my view, simple ones are FAT32, ext2.
> >
> > I think journaling is required which I see as within disk backup. A
robust and easy fsck like program which corrects err
Sagar Acharya wrote:
> Which are the filesystems which suckless recommends?
>
> In my view, simple ones are FAT32, ext2.
>
> I think journaling is required which I see as within disk backup. A robust
> and easy fsck like program which corrects errors easily. And a program which
> periodically
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:08:42PM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote:
> Which are the filesystems which suckless recommends?
>
> In my view, simple ones are FAT32, ext2.
>
> I think journaling is required which I see as within disk backup. A robust
> and easy fsck like program which corrects errors eas
Which are the filesystems which suckless recommends?
In my view, simple ones are FAT32, ext2.
I think journaling is required which I see as within disk backup. A robust and
easy fsck like program which corrects errors easily. And a program which
periodically checks memory and replaces all corru
