OFF TOPIC
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:33 AM, David wrote:
> If you have e.g. python, I'd use wx and if I really need advanced
> controls and a highly dynamic GUI, Qt.
I once wrote a rather small utility in python using Tkinter. My
co-workers wanted to use it, but they had Windows, and I wanted to
> > On 7/2/13, David wrote:
> >> Am 02.07.2013 09:46, schrieb Edgaras:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:11:36AM +0200, David wrote:
> Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
> > I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl and tk,
> > tk is
> > quite nice to work
Am 02.07.2013 16:34, schrieb hiro:
> On 7/2/13, David wrote:
>> Am 02.07.2013 09:46, schrieb Edgaras:
>>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:11:36AM +0200, David wrote:
Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
> I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl and tk,
> tk is
>>>
On 7/2/13, David wrote:
> Am 02.07.2013 09:46, schrieb Edgaras:
>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:11:36AM +0200, David wrote:
>>> Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl and tk,
tk is
quite nice to work with (with exception
Am 02.07.2013 12:48, schrieb Edgaras:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:33:08PM +0200, David wrote:
>> Am 02.07.2013 09:46, schrieb Edgaras:
>>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:11:36AM +0200, David wrote:
Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
> I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to in
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:33:08PM +0200, David wrote:
> Am 02.07.2013 09:46, schrieb Edgaras:
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:11:36AM +0200, David wrote:
> >> Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
> >>> I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl and tk,
> >>> tk is
> >>> quit
Am 02.07.2013 12:33, schrieb Jens Staal:
> On 2013-07-02 12:33, David wrote:
>> Am 02.07.2013 09:46, schrieb Edgaras:
>>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:11:36AM +0200, David wrote:
Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
> I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl
> an
On 2013-07-02 12:33, David wrote:
Am 02.07.2013 09:46, schrieb Edgaras:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:11:36AM +0200, David wrote:
Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl and tk, tk is
quite nice to work with (with exception of some sm
Am 02.07.2013 09:46, schrieb Edgaras:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:11:36AM +0200, David wrote:
>> Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
>>> I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl and tk, tk
>>> is
>>> quite nice to work with (with exception of some small hiccups), and if
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:11:36AM +0200, David wrote:
> Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
> > I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl and tk, tk
> > is
> > quite nice to work with (with exception of some small hiccups), and if you
> > have
> > a cli for controlling e
On 2 July 2013 14:11, David wrote:
> Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
>> I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl and tk, tk
>> is
>> quite nice to work with (with exception of some small hiccups), and if you
>> have
>> a cli for controlling everything it should wrap
Am 02.07.2013 07:08, schrieb Edgaras:
> I think you should reconsider tk, though you need to install tcl and tk, tk is
> quite nice to work with (with exception of some small hiccups), and if you
> have
> a cli for controlling everything it should wrap around it quite well.
>
I personally find Tk
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:11:12PM -0700, Charlie Paul wrote:
> > Write your UI as a Web application.
> That wouldn't work, as movement needs to be low latency.
>
It needn't be a remote server, if the idea appeals otherwise.
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:30:12PM -0700, Charlie Paul wrote:
> I don't
>want to have to install a dynamic language to do Tk.
Why? Can't control your deployment environment, don't have the resources,
doesn't feel pure to you? Something else?
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:30:12PM -0700, Charlie Paul wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working for a lab, and I'm making a piece of software to control a
> table full of optical elements (mirrors, lasers, and detectors). I wrote a
> nice little interface to the hardware in C, but now I need to make a way
> Tk?
Tk doesn't play nicely with non-dynamic languages, if I recall correctly.
Tk?
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:30:12PM -0700, Charlie Paul wrote:
>
> Now, my issue is choosing a GUI library. GTK and QT are big, and I don't
> want to have to install a dynamic language to do Tk. However, I do need to
> be able to do custom drawing (for the table elements on-screen). What GU
On 2 July 2013 10:36, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2 July 2013 10:22, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> He's joking
> You wouldn't be so sure if you knew the man. It's Kai we're talking
> about here; the web shines out of his every orifice. :-D
That's right. I'm not joking. The Web sucks less than crappy qt/g
> Got a link?
Here is its announcement: http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1005/3997.html
and the git repo: http://git.suckless.org/swk
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:12:08PM -0400, Carlos Torres wrote:
>You could/should try swk
Got a link?
On 2 July 2013 10:22, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> He's joking
You wouldn't be so sure if you knew the man. It's Kai we're talking
about here; the web shines out of his every orifice. :-D
> He's joking
Considering that the originaly drivers for some of the optics were
written in Ruby, it is hard to be sure about that...
He's joking
On Jul 1, 2013 10:11 PM, "Charlie Paul" wrote:
> > Write your UI as a Web application.
> That wouldn't work, as movement needs to be low latency.
>
>
> Write your UI as a Web application.
That wouldn't work, as movement needs to be low latency.
Write your UI as a Web application.
On Jul 1, 2013 5:30 PM, "Charlie Paul" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm working for a lab, and I'm making a piece of software to control a
table full of optical elements (mirrors, lasers, and detectors). I wrote a
nice little interface to the hardware in C, but now I need to make a way
for the user to co
I'd use GTK, since writing programs for it isn't terrible, it's in C
and you can just draw to a pixel buffer.
It sucks, but isn't not so sucky
On 1 July 2013 17:34, David wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Less of a GUI, more of a "do it yourself" toolkit. You could write your own
> little GUI toolkit using Op
Hello,
Less of a GUI, more of a "do it yourself" toolkit. You could write your
own little GUI toolkit using OpenGL and use glfw,
http://www.glfw.org/
https://github.com/glfw/glfw
to provide a OpenGL context. I don't recommend this though if you need
advanced controls and especially lots of differe
Hello,
I'm working for a lab, and I'm making a piece of software to control a
table full of optical elements (mirrors, lasers, and detectors). I wrote a
nice little interface to the hardware in C, but now I need to make a way
for the user to control the elements (move mirrors, turn stuff on and of
30 matches
Mail list logo
