totally; just speaking in terms of suckless projects hosted on suckless.org.
there basically IS a suckless DE. you just have to assemble it (much like
the fact that most suckless tools are meant to be compiled by the user).
apologies if this topquotes, I'm on a cell phone.
On Nov 9, 2011 4:53 PM,
* Seth Hover [2011-11-09 15:37-0800]:
> i don't know about you but running dwm + dmenu is about as close to a
> suckless DE as it gets (st and surf if you need the whole gamut, and I
> use st).
As is OpenBSD, nvi, herbstluftwm, xxxterm and urxvtd. See the issue now?
Everybody has its own preferre
It's funny because they don't realize they've been trolled.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
> [marketing-type distractions]
>
i don't know about you but running dwm + dmenu is about as close to a
suckless DE as it gets (st and surf if you need the whole gamut, and I use
st).
Dnia 9 listopada 2011 23:08 "2>&1" napisał(a):
> Ugh. Please read Elements of Style by Strunk & White, especially the section
> on lovers of big words.
> --
> Regards,
> 2>&1
The Joke Could Be On You.
- brought by,
Big Words Incorporated.
Hey did you hear the one about the giant? Nevermind, its over your head.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:08 PM, 2>&1 wrote:
> On Monday, 7 November 2011 2:07:44 pm Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> The very use of the phrase "Desktop Environment" betrays your
>> low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:08 PM, 2>&1 wrote:
>
> Ugh. Please read Elements of Style by Strunk & White, especially the
> section
> on lovers of big words.
>
>
hah. way to bite.
On Monday, 7 November 2011 2:07:44 pm Kurt H Maier wrote:
> The very use of the phrase "Desktop Environment" betrays your
> low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal conspiracy to
> restrict social mobility of non-institutional entity-computer
> interfaces. Your attempt to sidetrack philo
Somebody signing messages as Petr Sabata wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 03:13:35PM -0500, Sean Howard wrote:
> > Suckless, as an organization currently has a lot of tools, I personally use
> > very few of them.
> > dwm - I use this every day, and I twitch when I need to use a computer
> > witho
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 03:13:35PM -0500, Sean Howard wrote:
> Suckless, as an organization currently has a lot of tools, I personally use
> very few of them.
> dwm - I use this every day, and I twitch when I need to use a computer
> without it. I also twitch when I need to use a computer without
why you say that?
http://ano.lolcathost.org/finger.mhtml?id=1312461296190.jpg
On 11/08/11 12:02, Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
+- Kurt H Maier ---+
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:12 PM,
Justin Pogue wrote:
man porn
All pornography is male-oriented and oppressive.
although t
+- Kurt H Maier ---+
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:12 PM,
> Justin Pogue wrote:
> > man porn
>
> All pornography is male-oriented and oppressive.
although this is a good point, there are people who
try to change this, e.g. PorYes movement (poryes.de).
I'm in favor of this man porn.
On Nov 7, 2011 5:12 PM, "Justin Pogue" wrote:
> Dibs on writing the keyboard vs mouse for porn viewing documentation.
> We could sneak it in as an extra man page with DWM. man porn
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> > O
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Justin Pogue wrote:
> man porn
All pornography is male-oriented and oppressive.
--
# Kurt H Maier
Dibs on writing the keyboard vs mouse for porn viewing documentation.
We could sneak it in as an extra man page with DWM. man porn
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Of course we have huge disparities and holy fights, like how
> to edit text or if it is mo
Suckless should stay as-is,
but clarify (as done in this thread) its ideals – as you try to, too.
Such rules then can be used to define what »suckless« really is.
To "suck less" is about subjectivity. It's a matter of taste.
Suckless.org is about software tools available for everybody.
Not abou
(I apologize for my MUA failing as hard as it does...)
While I agree that a collection of suckless tools under one roof
wouldbe pretty awesome (especially something like sta.li or witch
linux), I'mnot sure that marketing as a desktop environment is the
right thing to do.
I'm part of a small project called tudor[0] that aims to replicate a
DE experience
On 11/07/11 at 09:34pm, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> But yes, the users we want in suckless should be sophisticated
> enough to find this out on their own. We are taking the subset of
> users from the Ubuntu[0]-educated crowd and filter them for the
> real suckless users, that could spread our ideas.
On 7 November 2011 21:34, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> It is not about adding something real. Suckless should stay as-is,
> but clarify (as done in this thread) its ideals – as you try to, too.
> Such rules then can be used to define what »suckless« really is.
> But the question is, i
Greetings.
I am just answering Anselm, but try to answer the open questions
of the other postings too.
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Another remark:
>
> On 7 November 2011 20:21, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>> reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
>> terminology to m
On 7 November 2011 15:13, Sean Howard wrote:
> > The idea would be to first have an identity, the »Suckless
> > Desktop«, which needs a logo, some texts and then links to
> > the various parts of suckless. This would be the entrypoint
> > for new users, where they can decide, what to adopt to or
Another remark:
On 7 November 2011 20:21, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
> terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
> less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
> This does not sell. Instea
* Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> [2011-11-07 20:23]:
> terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. [...] Instead
> a whole environment could be promoted, which is usable across
> platforms.
Why?
Promote to whom?
What is your final goal: to educate the masses in order to get bett
Somebody claiming to be Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
>
> reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
> terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
> less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
> This does not sell. Instead a whole
On 7 November 2011 20:21, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
>
> reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
> terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
> less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
> This does not sell.
Can I vote this "best of"?
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> The very use of the phrase "Desktop Environment" betrays your
> low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal conspiracy to
> restrict social mobility of non-institutional entity-computer
> interfaces. Your at
The very use of the phrase "Desktop Environment" betrays your
low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal conspiracy to
restrict social mobility of non-institutional entity-computer
interfaces. Your attempt to sidetrack philosophical advances by
creating a cult of information around your pa
Greetings comrades,
reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
This does not sell. Instead a whole environment could be pro-
moted, which is usable across platf
29 matches
Mail list logo
